Many legal practitioners received a liberal arts education and deeply studied good writing. Whether from our history theses, English literature studies, or sociology experiments, we learned how to write well.
And then we went to law school. The writing we learned there in many ways deviated from the best practices we learned in our undergrad years.
If you’re someone who cares about the craft of writing, how might you improve the state of legal writing scholarship? One option might be to become a legal writing teacher and change the system from the inside.
To learn more about how someone might become a legal writing teacher, I asked the Legal Writing Pro himself, Ross Guberman. Here’s what he had to say:
Process-wise, most law schools are pretty eager to find adjunct professors to teach the first year writing class. That class is much harder to teach than a lot of people think it’s going to be, but that would be the formal way to get started.
As Ross suggested, there are downsides to the traditional legal writing professor path. As Professor Mary Dunnewold wrote, the cons are many:
Still, if you have the desire and energy to push through those barriers, there are opportunities available. Start by reading this seminal piece on the legal writing prof path by Jan Levine and contact your local law school about adjunct opportunities. That may be a sound strategy for getting your foot in the door.
If you want to go a less traditional route to improving the state of legal writing scholarship, Ross suggests that you look to your local CLE provider.
There are lots of bar associations and other organizations clamoring for good speakers to do CLEs.
CLE sponsors range from state bars to law schools to private companies. Reach out to those providers and pitch an idea for a CLE session. Rather than simply express interest in teaching legal writing, offer up a few possible titles of CLE sessions. You’ll make the decision easier for the provider if you offer specifics.
If you’re really ambitious you can start your own CLE conference. Although hosting a live event is incredibly difficult (I hosted one for five years in Austin before coming to Casetext), the work is very rewarding. You can improve the industry and gain exposure for your ideas by playing the impresario, or the organizer.
I recently spoke with Ruth Ann Robbins, professor of legal writing at Rutgers, about her involvement in the Applied Legal Storytelling Conference. Even with such a niche legal writing topic, the event draws a steady flow of audience and interest. You might host your own event by partnering with a law school and applying for CLE credit in your state.
While encouraging lawyers who care about writing to teach, Ross Guberman strongly suggests that you do it well.
The biggest problem is that people get up and just run their mouths, spewing platitudes about legal writing that everyone’s already heard. They often just give their own personal preferences.
Instead, Ross says that you should hold yourself to a higher standard of writing scholarship.
Whether you’re talking about formal workshops or informal mentoring, the secret is to try to be very empirical. Ground your advice in specific examples from specific types of lawyers or judges who are really successful. Stay away from anything that’s just your own view or your own take.
It is true that you have to start from somewhere, and when you begin teaching you’ll probably spout off a platitude or two. But push yourself to really move the needle for legal writers.
Whether you obsess over Oxford commas and double spaces, or are a missionary for good storytelling, make sure you deliver the goods. The legal writing world needs you to take your teaching seriously.
To see the entire interview with Ross, check out the video below…
And take a look at the other articles in this series on better writing for lawyers. We’re happy to support the development of good writing habits and would love a chance to explain how you can incorporate Casetext’s AI-enabled research tools to enhance your skills.
Please take a moment to schedule a demo of Casetext’s research tools, and take advantage of our free trial. As you’ll see, we aim to help good lawyers like you improve their craft.
Rapidly draft common legal letters and emails.
How this skill works
Specify the recipient, topic, and tone of the correspondence you want.
CoCounsel will produce a draft.
Chat back and forth with CoCounsel to edit the draft.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.
How this skill works
Enter a question or issue, along with relevant facts such as jurisdiction, area of law, etc.
CoCounsel will retrieve relevant legal resources and provide an answer with explanation and supporting sources.
Behind the scenes, Conduct Research generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identify the on-point case law, statutes, and regulations, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), along with the supporting sources and applicable excerpts.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.
How this skill works
Enter a question or issue, along with relevant facts such as jurisdiction, area of law, etc.
CoCounsel will retrieve relevant legal resources and provide an answer with explanation and supporting sources.
Behind the scenes, Conduct Research generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identify the on-point case law, statutes, and regulations, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), along with the supporting sources and applicable excerpts.
Get a thorough deposition outline in no time, just by describing the deponent and what’s at issue.
How this skill works
Describe the deponent and what’s at issue in the case, and CoCounsel identifies multiple highly relevant topics to address in the deposition and drafts questions for each topic.
Refine topics by including specific areas of interest and get a thorough deposition outline.
Ask questions of contracts that are analyzed in a line-by-line review
How this skill works
Allows the user to upload a set of contracts and a set of questions
This skill will provide an answer to those questions for each contract, or, if the question is not relevant to the contract, provide that information as well
Upload up to 10 contracts at once
Ask up to 10 questions of each contract
Relevant results will hyperlink to identified passages in the corresponding contract
Get a list of all parts of a set of contracts that don’t comply with a set of policies.
How this skill works
Upload a set of contracts and then describe a policy or set of policies that the contracts should comply with, e.g. "contracts must contain a right to injunctive relief, not merely the right to seek injunctive relief."
CoCounsel will review your contracts and identify any contractual clauses relevant to the policy or policies you specified.
If there is any conflict between a contractual clause and a policy you described, CoCounsel will recommend a revised clause that complies with the relevant policy. It will also identify the risks presented by a clause that does not conform to the policy you described.
Get an overview of any document in straightforward, everyday language.
How this skill works
Upload a document–e.g. a legal memorandum, judicial opinion, or contract.
CoCounsel will summarize the document using everyday terminology.
Find all instances of relevant information in a database of documents.
How this skill works
Select a database and describe what you're looking for in detail, such as templates and precedents to use as a starting point for drafting documents, or specific clauses and provisions you'd like to include in new documents you're working on.
CoCounsel identifies and delivers every instance of what you're searching for, citing sources in the database for each instance.
Behind the scenes, CoCounsel generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identifiy the on-point passages from every document in the database, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), citing applicable excerpts in specific documents.
Get a list of all parts of a set of contracts that don’t comply with a set of policies.
Ask questions of contracts that are analyzed in a line-by-line review
Get a thorough deposition outline by describing the deponent and what’s at issue.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.