In the latest Compose webinar, “A.I. for Products Liability Motions,” our CEO Jake Heller sat down with attorneys and Compose Advisory Board members Chris Nidel and Andrew Turkish to discuss how they leverage technology in their respective products liability practices.
Chris and Andrew represent opposite parties in products liability cases – Chris is the named partner of Nidel & Nace, a plaintiff-side firm that litigates pharmaceutical products liability and environmental toxic torts cases. Andrew is a partner at Clausen Miller, where he focuses on defense-side products liability cases.
Here are Chris’ and Andrew’s responses to Jake’s questions about products liability and innovation, the importance of efficiency, and ways to use Compose to create better outcomes for both plaintiffs and defendants in brief drafting and litigation.
“How do you view the role of technology in your practice?”
“I’m old school, so I’ve had to incorporate technology into my practice,” Andrew said. “When I first started practicing, computers were primitive, research was primitive, and there were no emails and there was no Internet.” But today, Andrew embraces technology. “For me it’s 24/7. If I’m not on my computer at work or my laptop at home, I’m on my iPhone.”
Chris echoed the same sentiment, putting it bluntly: “Technology is central to any kind of success.” He highlighted the role of technology in leveling the playing field as well, helping smaller practices compete with resource-rich large firms.
“What does efficiency mean to your practice?”
Andrew, as a defense-side products liability attorney at a large firm, has lots of resources at his disposal. But efficiency is still extremely important: “I have a high-volume practice; I can’t spend 25 hours on a brief,” he said. “If I can spend 5 hours on a brief and devote that extra time to another case, I’m ahead of the game. So efficiency is very important from the defense perspective.”
And with the products liability plaintiff side usually having access to fewer resources than the defense, efficiency is critical to Chris’ success in cases. “My practice is everything about efficiency – it’s not just efficiency in terms of money, but it’s efficiency in terms of time,” he said. He detailed a particular example in trial where he himself had to take on roles that require multiple staff, something that the defense almost always has in surplus. “Me standing there alone, with an iPad, did the work of a handful of people and thousands of dollars, where I was doing my cross examination at the same time as I was pulling up the next exhibit,” he said. “I was doing the role of two or three people and doing callouts and doing all this stuff during trial with software that was a hundred dollar, one-time purchase versus this whole suite of software and staff that [the defense] have.”
“What’d you learn from the experience working with the Compose team and the Compose content?”
Even as a products liability attorney with over thirty years of experience, Andrew finds Compose’s products liability templates useful in brief drafting. “I found the Compose outlines that I looked at and reviewed very thorough, very helpful, and I think the practitioner will also find that,” he said.
As for Chris, he was struck by Compose’s attention to the nuances of products liability arguments and motions, and he found Compose’s comprehensiveness to be central to building counterarguments against the defense. “Compose gives you a way to get your feet back on the ground very quickly and say, ‘You know what, I’ve got arguments here and this isn’t a loser,’” he said. “It takes the sting out of dealing with that initial step in responding to a motion, and it allows you very quickly to see that there are arguments that you can make, there are cases to support those arguments, and you don’t necessarily have a loser just because [the defense] were able to pull some cases and make that argument to the court.”
To learn more about how Compose’s technology is reshaping products liability law, watch the recording of our “A.I. for Products Liability Motions” webinar here. Or, join us this week for another webinar introducing new technologies that reshape products liability law: https://compose.law/pl-draft-high-quality-briefs/.
Rapidly draft common legal letters and emails.
How this skill works
Specify the recipient, topic, and tone of the correspondence you want.
CoCounsel will produce a draft.
Chat back and forth with CoCounsel to edit the draft.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.
How this skill works
Enter a question or issue, along with relevant facts such as jurisdiction, area of law, etc.
CoCounsel will retrieve relevant legal resources and provide an answer with explanation and supporting sources.
Behind the scenes, Conduct Research generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identify the on-point case law, statutes, and regulations, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), along with the supporting sources and applicable excerpts.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.
How this skill works
Enter a question or issue, along with relevant facts such as jurisdiction, area of law, etc.
CoCounsel will retrieve relevant legal resources and provide an answer with explanation and supporting sources.
Behind the scenes, Conduct Research generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identify the on-point case law, statutes, and regulations, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), along with the supporting sources and applicable excerpts.
Get a thorough deposition outline in no time, just by describing the deponent and what’s at issue.
How this skill works
Describe the deponent and what’s at issue in the case, and CoCounsel identifies multiple highly relevant topics to address in the deposition and drafts questions for each topic.
Refine topics by including specific areas of interest and get a thorough deposition outline.
Ask questions of contracts that are analyzed in a line-by-line review
How this skill works
Allows the user to upload a set of contracts and a set of questions
This skill will provide an answer to those questions for each contract, or, if the question is not relevant to the contract, provide that information as well
Upload up to 10 contracts at once
Ask up to 10 questions of each contract
Relevant results will hyperlink to identified passages in the corresponding contract
Get a list of all parts of a set of contracts that don’t comply with a set of policies.
How this skill works
Upload a set of contracts and then describe a policy or set of policies that the contracts should comply with, e.g. "contracts must contain a right to injunctive relief, not merely the right to seek injunctive relief."
CoCounsel will review your contracts and identify any contractual clauses relevant to the policy or policies you specified.
If there is any conflict between a contractual clause and a policy you described, CoCounsel will recommend a revised clause that complies with the relevant policy. It will also identify the risks presented by a clause that does not conform to the policy you described.
Get an overview of any document in straightforward, everyday language.
How this skill works
Upload a document–e.g. a legal memorandum, judicial opinion, or contract.
CoCounsel will summarize the document using everyday terminology.
Find all instances of relevant information in a database of documents.
How this skill works
Select a database and describe what you're looking for in detail, such as templates and precedents to use as a starting point for drafting documents, or specific clauses and provisions you'd like to include in new documents you're working on.
CoCounsel identifies and delivers every instance of what you're searching for, citing sources in the database for each instance.
Behind the scenes, CoCounsel generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identifiy the on-point passages from every document in the database, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), citing applicable excerpts in specific documents.
Get a list of all parts of a set of contracts that don’t comply with a set of policies.
Ask questions of contracts that are analyzed in a line-by-line review
Get a thorough deposition outline by describing the deponent and what’s at issue.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.