Or. Uni. Trial. Ct. R. 3.180

As amended through June 11, 2024
Rule 3.180 - ELECTRONIC RECORDING AND WRITING
(1) As used in this rule:
(a) "Electronic Recording" includes video recording, audio recording, and still photography by cell phone, tablet, computer, camera, tape recorder, or any other means. "Electronic recording" does not include "electronic writing."
(b) Electronic Writing" means the taking of notes or otherwise writing by electronic means and includes but is not limited to the use of word processing software and the composition of texts, emails, and instant messages.
(c) "Electronic Transmission" means to send an electronic recording or writing, including but not limited to transmission by email, text, or instant message; live streaming; or posting to a social media or networking service.
(2) Except with the express prior permission of the court, and except as provided in subsection (3) of this rule, a person may not:
(a) Electronically record in any area of the courthouse under the control and supervision of the court unless permitted by Supplementary Local Rule (SLR) pursuant to subsection (11)(a) of this rule;
(b) Electronically record any court proceeding;
(c) Electronically transmit any recording from within a courtroom during a proceeding; (d) Engage in electronic writing within a courtroom;
(e) Electronically transmit any electronic writing from within a courtroom during a proceeding; or
(f) While remotely observing or participating in a proceeding, electronically transmit any electronic writing directly and specifically to a witness until the witness is excused by the court.
(3) Subsections (2)(d), (e), and (f) of this rule do not apply to attorneys or to agents of attorneys unless otherwise ordered by the court.
(4)
(a) A request for permission to engage in electronic recording or writing must be made prior to the start of a proceeding. No fee may be charged.
(b) The granting of permission to any person or entity to engage in electronic recording or writing is subject to the court's discretion, which may include considerations of the need to preserve the solemnity, decorum, or dignity of the court; the protection of the parties, witnesses, or jurors; or whether the requestor has demonstrated an understanding of all provisions of this rule.
(c) If the court grants all or part of the request,
(i) The court shall provide notice to all parties, and electronic recording or writing thereafter shall be allowed in the proceeding, in any courtroom or during a remote proceeding, consistent with the court's permission.
(ii) The court shall permit one video camera, one still camera, and one audio recorder in the courtroom, and it may permit additional cameras and electronic recording in any courtroom or during a remote proceeding consistent with this rule.
(iii) The court may prescribe the location of and the manner of operating electronic equipment within a courtroom. Artificial lighting is not permitted.
(iv) Any pooling arrangement made necessary by limitations on equipment or personnel imposed by the court is the sole responsibility of the persons or entities seeking to electronically record.
(v) The court will not mediate disputes. If multiple persons or entities seeking to electronically record are unable to agree on the manner in which the recording will be conducted or distributed, the court may terminate any or all such recording.
(5) Except as otherwise provided in this rule:
(a) The court shall not wholly prohibit all electronic recording of a court proceeding unless the court makes findings of fact on the record setting forth substantial reasons that establish:
(i) A reasonable likelihood that the electronic recording will interfere with the rights of the parties to a fair trial or will affect the presentation of evidence or the outcome of the trial; or
(ii) A reasonable likelihood that the costs or other burdens imposed by the electronic recording will interfere with the efficient administration of justice.
(b) "Wholly prohibit all electronic recording" means issuing an order prohibiting all recording of a proceeding by all persons. The court's denial of a particular request under the factors in section (4)(b) does not constitute an order prohibiting all recording by all persons and does not require findings of fact on the record, even if the person whose request is denied is the only person who has requested permission to record a proceeding.
(6) The court has discretion to limit electronic recording of particular components of the proceeding based on one or more of the following factors:
(a) The limitation is necessary to preserve the solemnity, decorum, or dignity of the court or to protect the parties, witnesses, or jurors;
(b) The use of electronic recording equipment interferes with the proceedings;
(c) The electronic recording of a particular witness would endanger the welfare of the witness or materially hamper the testimony of the witness; or
(d) The requestor has not demonstrated an understanding of all provisions of this rule.
(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this rule, the following may not be electronically recorded by any person at any time:
(a) Proceedings in chambers.
(b) Any notes or conversations intended to be private including but not limited to attorneys and judges conferring at the bench and conferences involving attorneys and their clients.
(c) Dissolution, juvenile, paternity, adoption, custody, visitation, support, civil commitment, trade secrets, and abuse, restraining, and stalking order proceedings.
(d) Proceedings involving a sex crime, if the victim has requested that the proceeding not be electronically recorded.
(e) Voir dire.
(f) Any juror anywhere under the control and supervision of the court during the entire course of the trial in which the juror sits.
(g) Recesses or any other time the court is off the record.
(8) For the purpose of determining whether this rule or other requirements imposed by the court have been violated, or to ensure the effective administration of justice, a person engaged in electronic recording under this rule must, upon request and without expense to the court, provide to the court, for in camera review, an electronic recording in a format accessible to the court. The copy may be retained by the court and may be sealed if necessary for the further administration of justice.
(9) If a person violates this rule or any other requirement imposed by the court, the court may order the person, and any organization with which the person is affiliated, to terminate electronic recording or electronic writing.
(10) This rule does not:
(a) Limit the court's contempt powers;
(b) Operate to waive ORS 44.510 to 44.540 (media shield law); or
(c) Apply to court personnel engaged in the performance of official duties.
(11) A judicial district may, by SLR:
(a) Designate areas outside a courtroom and under the control and supervision of the court, including hallways or entrances, where electronic recording is allowed without prior permission, unless otherwise ordered in a particular instance.
(b) Adopt procedures to obtain permission for electronic recording or electronic writing.
(c) SLR 3.181 is reserved for any SLR adopted under this subsection.

Or. Uni. Trial. Ct. R. 3.180

Amended June 10, 2022, effective 8/1/2022; amended November 15, 2022, effective 11/15/2022; amended June 11, 2024, effective 8/1/2024.

UTCR 3.180 was adopted by the entire Oregon Supreme Court, and any changes to the rule will be made only with the consent of the Supreme Court.