The procedures in this rule apply to all actions under this chapter in which there are no minor children.
Me. R. Civ. P. 110B
Advisory Note - February 2023
Rule 110B is amended to implement a case management process for cases that do not involve minor children.
Advisory Notes
Because there is no case management system for cases that do not involve minor children, some system-wide procedure should be implemented. Scheduling Orders shall be issued in cases that are not subject to the Case Management System. These orders have been employed in some of the courts across the state and have been effective at managing the flow of cases when there is no Family Law Magistrate oversight. These cases may involve highly charged, emotional issues. There may be cases in which both parties agree that the court-ordered schedule does not meet their needs. The court should honor a request made jointly by the parties to amend the Scheduling Order. Scheduling Orders need not be issued when there is no answer, response or entry of appearance. The rule also provides that these cases should be set for uncontested hearing so that they do not lay dormant.
Rule 110B is the former Rule 80(h). It has been the practice of the court to hold prehearing conferences to discuss discovery and trial issues and to hold judicial settlement conferences. All conferences before a final hearing are prehearing conferences and the authority to hold them is derived from this rule. The rule permits attendance by telephone, if permission is acquired before the conference, mediation or hearing.
Because there is a variety of post-judgment motions, a standard Scheduling Order would be impossible to draft. The court must exercise its discretion to determine the appropriate pretrial procedure in any particular case after review of the filings.
Advisory Note - July 2016
The change to Rule 110B(a) corrects a grammatical error.