In contested proceedings, magistrates may hear and decide interim orders establishing parental rights and responsibilities. In contested final proceedings under a pilot project established by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, with the consent of the parties, a magistrate may hear and decide all elements of certain final contested actions for divorce with children, legal separation with children, parentage, or parental rights. When the parties are subject to a Protection from Abuse order, magistrates may amend the parental rights and responsibilities portion of the protection order to conform with the orders authorized above.
Nothing in these rules shall prohibit a judge from managing a case as provided in these rules.
In appropriate circumstances, a magistrate may dispense with a conference and set the matter promptly for hearing, may enter agreements on the record at the conference, may hold a hearing immediately following the conference, or may advise the parties that the matter will be referred to a judge.
Me. R. Civ. P. 110A
Advisory Note - October 2022
The rule has been amended pursuant to P.L. 2021, ch. 723, § 6 (effective Aug. 8, 2022) (to be codified at 4 M.R.S. § 183(1)(D)(2)) , to remove the process by which the parties had the right to have a judge determine interim parental rights and responsibilities. The statutory revision grants family law magistrates the authority to determine interim parental rights and responsibilities with or without the parties' consent.
Advisory Notes
The rule recognizes that pre-hearing procedure applies to two groups of Family Division actions --those with minor children and those without. Cases involving minor children should receive priority treatment. Rule 110A applies to actions involving minor children. Rule 110B applies to actions that do not involve minor children.
Rule 110A incorporates substantial portions of the current Family Division rules relating to calendaring and scheduling of cases and conduct of case management conferences.
Subdivision (a) is based on FAM DIV I.C. making specific reference to the authority and limitations on authority of Family Law Magistrates. It also corresponds with the accepted practice that emancipation actions have not been placed in the case management system because of their summary nature. It clarifies that magistrates may act in uncontested matters on post-judgment motions.
Subdivision (b)(1) is based on FAM DIV III.A.1. It relates to scheduling of conferences before Family Law Magistrates. FAM DIV III.A.1 states a list of issues that may be raised by the court or the parties and be considered at the conference. Subdivision(b)(1) does not include the list. The list of issues that may be addressed and actions that may be considered is stated in Rule 107(a) relating to interim orders and cross referenced in this draft to avoid duplication and confusion that might result from any different wording.
Child support affidavits are based on FAM DIV III.A.2 and are addressed by Rule 108.
Subsection (b)(2) is based on FAM DIV III.A.3.
Subsection (b)(3)(A)(i) is based on FAM DIV III.A.4 and is amended to include requests to continue mediation.
Subsection (b)(3)(A)(ii) relating to deferral of a conference is a new provision and permits the parties to attend mediation before a conference with the court. The amendment also requires the parties to pay the mediation fee if mediation is requested.
Subsection (b)(3)(B) is based on FAM DIV III.A.5 and requires the parties to obtain dates for mediation and payment of the mediation fee.
Subsection (b)(4) is based on FAM DIV III.B.
Subsection (b)(5) is based on FAM DIV III.C.
Subsection (b)(6) is based on FAM DIV III.D. and Rule 80(k)(2). The new rule provides that Motions to Enforce shall be eliminated from the case management system to avoid delay in enforcing existing orders. This is consistent with the recommendation of the Family Division Task Force to reduce the number of conferences in family matters.
FAM DIV III.E & F. are addressed in Rule 114.
Subsection (b)(7) is based on FAM DIV III.G(1). FAM DIV III.G.2-4 is addressed in Rule 118.
Advisory Note July 1, 2009
This amendment is added to Rule 110A(b)(4)(B) to recognize past and current practice that parties to domestic relations actions requiring mediation may, by agreement, arrange and pay for private mediation in place of mediation provided pursuant to Rule 92.
Advisory Note - July 2016
For the changes made to Rule 110A(a) and (b)(1), see the July 2016 Advisory Note to Rule 100. For the change made to Rule 110A(b)(4)(C), see the July 2016 Advisory Note to Rule 107. Although mediation is required for many family matters, it is not required for adoptions, name changes, or guardianships for minor children. See M.R. Civ. P. 92(b)(2). As a result, it was necessary to make changes to Rules 110A(b)(3)(B), 110A(b)(4)(C), and 110A(b)(5)(B), and to add Rule 110A(b)(5)(C). The changes to Rule 110A(b)(6)(B) refer to the statewide use of post-judgment "triage" lists and the post-triage referral to a judge of any cases not resolved, and reflect a recommendation made by the FDTF 2014 report. Additional changes throughout the rule correct typographical or grammatical errors, attempt to improve the readability of the rule, reflect the reality that some family matters have more than two parties, and reflect the Judicial Branch's attempt to change all dates for deadlines to multiples of 7.