N.J. Admin. Code § 2:76-6.16

Current through Register Vol. 56, No. 21, November 4, 2024

Section 2:76-6.16 - Criteria for evaluating development easement applications

(a) The evaluation shall be based on the merits of the individual application and the application's contribution to its respective project area. The weight factor assigned to each criterion identifies the relative importance of the specific criterion in relation to the other criteria.

(b) The criteria listed in (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) below shall be combined to demonstrate the degree to which the purchase would encourage the survivability of the municipally approved program in productive agriculture.

(c) The soil quality criterion (weight 15) is as follows:

1. Priority will be given to soils which exhibit superior quality, require minimal maintenance and have a greater potential for long term viability for a variety of agricultural purposes.

2. Factors to be considered are as follows:

i. Prime soils identified by the U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service;

ii. Soils of Statewide importance as identified by the New Jersey Department of Agriculture, State Soil Conservation Committee; and

iii. Other soils which are specifically suited for the production of specialty crops and are being used or intended to be used for that purpose.

(d) The tillable acres criterion (weight 15) is as follows:

1. Priority will be given to the proportion of the land that is deemed tillable.

2. Factors to be considered and deemed to be tillable will be lands devoted to cropland harvested, cropland pastured and permanent pasture. For purposes of evaluating these factors, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

i. "Cropland harvested" means land from which a crop was harvested in the current year. Cropland harvested shall include the land under structures utilized for agricultural or horticultural production.

ii. "Cropland pastured" means land which can be and often is used to produce crops, but its maximum income may not be realized in a particular year. This includes land that is fallow or in cover crops as part of a rotational program.

iii. "Permanent pasture" means land that is not cultivated because its maximum economic potential is realized from grazing or as part of erosion control programs. Animals may or may not be part of the farm operation.

(e) The boundaries and buffers criterion (weight 20) is as follows:

1. Priority will be given to the greatest proportion of boundaries with buffers which help protect the integrity of the individual application and/or project area from conflicting nonagricultural uses.

2. Factors to be considered are as follows:

i. The type and quality of buffers, including:

(1) Compatible uses as follows:

(A) Deed restricted farmland (permanent);

(B) Deed restricted wildlife areas;

(C) Eight year programs;

(D) Farmland (unrestricted);

(E) Streams (perennial) and wetlands;

(F) Parks (limited public access);

(G) Parks (high use);

(H) Military installations;

(I) Highways (limited access);

(J) Golf course (public); and

(K) Other compatible buffers.

(2) Conflicting uses as follows:

(A) Residential; and

(B) Other;

(3) Negative consideration:

(A) Exceptions which adversely affect the applicant's agricultural operation (weight 10); and

ii. Percentage of boundaries buffering the individual application.

(f) The local commitment criterion (weight 20) is as follows:

1. Priority will be given where municipal and county land use regulations and policies support the long term viability of the agricultural industry.

2. Factors to be considered are as follows:

i. Zoning ordinances and densities which discourage conflicting nonagricultural development;

ii. Absence of sewer or other growth leading infrastructure;

iii. Consistency with municipal, county, state and regional plans;

iv. Municipal commitment to actively participate in the Agriculture Retention and Development Program;

v. Right to farm and other ordinances supporting agriculture; and

vi. Community financial support for the project area.

(g) The size and density criterion (weight 20) is as follows:

1. Priority will be given to larger masses with higher density of the lands dedicated to farmland preservation.

2. Factors to be considered are as follows:

i. The size of the individual application;

ii. The size of the individual application in relation to the average farm size in the respective county; and

iii. The density of the individual application in relation to the project area. Density shall be recognized as the reasonable contiguity, within one-half mile, of lands encompassed by development easement purchase applications, development easements purchased, other permanently deed restricted farmlands, farmland preservation programs and municipally approved programs.

(h) The board's highest ranked application (weight 10) will be given priority consideration to recognize local factors which encourage the degree to which the purchase would encourage the survivability of the municipally approved program in productive agriculture and degree of imminence of change of the land from productive agriculture to nonagricultural use.

(i) Factors which determine the degree of imminence of change of the land from productive agriculture to nonagricultural use criterion (weight 10) are as follows:

1. Priority will be given to minimizing the negative impacts caused by the imminent conversion of agricultural land to a nonagricultural use.

2. Factors to be considered are as follows:

i. The degree of imminence of change; and

ii. The impact of the conversion.

N.J. Admin. Code § 2:76-6.16

New Rule, R.1988 d.493, effective 10/17/1988.
See: 20 New Jersey Register 1503(a), 20 New Jersey Register 2565(a).
Amended by R.1989 d.537, effective 10/16/1989.
See: 21 New Jersey Register 2152(a), 21 New Jersey Register 3294(a).
Reduction of total available points from 100 to 90, clarification of the local commitment calculation and additional unweighted special considerations.
Amended by R.1990 d.529, effective 11/5/1990.
See: 22 New Jersey Register 1244(a), 22 New Jersey Register 3359(a).
Deleted formula at (h), recodified subsection.
Amended by R.1993 d.392, effective 8/2/1993.
See: 25 New Jersey Register 1804(d), 25 New Jersey Register 3453(e).
Amended by R.1995 d.505, effective 9/5/1995.
See: 27 New Jersey Register 2295(a), 27 New Jersey Register 3323(a).
Inserted (d) and redesignated former (d) to (h) as (e) to (i), in (c) substituted "15" for "30", and in (g)(2)(iii) inserted "reasonable" and ", within one-half mile,".
Amended by R.1995 d.613, effective 12/4/1995.
See: 27 New Jersey Register 13(a), 27 New Jersey Register 4875(a).
Administrative correction.
See: 28 New Jersey Register 813(b).