Extension of Compliance Dates for Medical Examiner's Certification Integration

AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

FMCSA amends its regulations to extend the compliance date from June 22, 2021, to June 23, 2025, for several provisions of its April 23, 2015, Medical Examiner's Certification Integration final rule. FMCSA issued an interim final rule (IFR) on June 21, 2018, extending the compliance date for these provisions until June 22, 2021. FMCSA published a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) on April 22, 2021, that proposed further extending the compliance date to June 23, 2025. This final rule will provide FMCSA time to complete certain information technology (IT) system development tasks for its National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners (National Registry) and to provide the State Driver's Licensing Agencies (SDLAs) sufficient time to make the necessary IT programming changes when the new National Registry system is completed and available.

DATES:

This final rule is effective June 22, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical Programs Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Dockets Operations, (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FMCSA organizes this final rule as follows:

I. Availability of Rulemaking Documents

II. Executive Summary

III. Legal Basis

A. Authority Over Drivers Affected; Drivers Required To Obtain a Medical Examiner's Certificate (MEC)

B. Authority To Regulate State CDL Programs

C. Authority To Require Reporting by MEs

IV. Background

V. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments

A. Background and Proposed Rulemaking

B. Comments and Responses

V. Good Cause Exists

VII. International Impacts

VIII. Changes From the SNPRM

IX. Section-By-Section Analysis

X. Regulatory Analyses

A. E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O. 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures

B. Congressional Review Act

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (Small Entities)

D. Assistance for Small Entities

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

F. Paperwork Reduction Act (Collection of Information)

G. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)

H. Privacy

I. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)

J. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

I. Availability of Rulemaking Documents

To view any documents mentioned as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FMCSA-2018-0152/document and choose the document to review. To view comments, click this final rule, and click “Browse Comments.” If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket online by visiting Dockets Operations in Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 366-9317 or (202) 366-9826 before visiting Dockets Operations.

II. Executive Summary

FMCSA adjusts the compliance date from June 22, 2021, to June 23, 2025, for several provisions in the Medical Examiner's Certification Integration final rule (80 FR 22790, Apr. 23, 2015). Specifically, the Agency postpones to June 23, 2025, the provisions for: (1) FMCSA to electronically transmit, from the National Registry to the SDLAs, driver identification information, examination results, and restriction information from examinations performed for holders of commercial learner's permits (CLPs) or commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) (interstate and intrastate); (2) FMCSA to electronically transmit to the SDLAs medical variance information for all commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers; (3) SDLAs to post on the Commercial Driver's License Information System (CDLIS) driver record the driver identification, examination results, and restriction information received electronically from FMCSA; and (4) motor carriers to no longer be required to verify that CLP/CDL drivers were certified by a certified medical examiner (ME) listed on the National Registry.

The compliance date for these provisions was postponed previously from June 22, 2018, to June 22, 2021, by an interim final rule (83 FR 28774). This final rule specifies that FMCSA now amends again the regulations adopted in the 2015 final rule and amended in the IFR to include a compliance date, generally, of June 23, 2025.

III. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking

The legal basis of the 2015 final rule, set out at 80 FR 22791-22792, serves as the legal basis for this rule. Brief summaries of the relevant legal bases for the actions taken in this rulemaking are set out below.

A. Authority Over Drivers Affected; Drivers Required To Obtain a Medical Examiner's Certificate (MEC)

FMCSA is required by statute to establish standards for the physical qualifications of drivers who operate CMVs in interstate commerce for non-excepted industries (49 U.S.C. 31136(a)(3) and 31502(b)). Subject to certain limited exceptions, FMCSA has fulfilled the statutory mandate by establishing physical qualification standards for all drivers covered by these provisions (49 CFR 391.11(b)(4)). Such drivers must obtain, from an ME, a certification indicating that the driver is physically qualified to drive a CMV (49 CFR 391.41(a), 391.43(g) and (h)). FMCSA is also required to ensure that the operation of a CMV does not have a deleterious effect on the physical condition of drivers (49 U.S.C. 31136(a)(4)).

Drivers Required To Obtain a CDL

The authority for FMCSA to require an operator of a CMV to obtain a CDL is based on 49 U.S.C. 31302, and the authority to set minimum standards for the testing and fitness of such operators rests on 49 U.S.C. 31305.

B. Authority To Regulate State CDL Programs

Under 49 U.S.C. 31311 and 31314, FMCSA has authority to prescribe procedures and requirements the States must follow when issuing CDLs (see, generally, 49 CFR parts 383 and 384). In particular, under section 31314, in order to avoid loss of certain Federal-aid highway funds otherwise apportioned under 23 U.S.C. 104(b), each State must comply with the requirement in 49 U.S.C. 31311(a)(1) to adopt and carry out a program for testing and ensuring the fitness of individuals to operate CMVs consistent with the minimum standards prescribed by FMCSA under 49 U.S.C. 31305(a) (see also 49 CFR 384.201).

C. Authority To Require Reporting by MEs

FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31133(a)(8) and 31149(c)(1)(E) to require MEs on the National Registry to obtain information from CMV drivers regarding their physical health, to record and retain the results of the physical examinations of CMV drivers, and to require frequent reporting of the information contained on the MECs they issue. Section 31133(a)(8) gives the Agency broad administrative powers (specifically “to prescribe recordkeeping and reporting requirements”) to assist in ensuring motor carrier safety and driver health (Sen. Report No. 98-424 at 9 (May 2, 1984)). Section 31149(c)(1)(E) authorizes a requirement for electronic reporting of certain specific information by MEs, including applicant names and numerical identifiers as determined by the FMCSA Administrator. Section 31149(c)(1)(E) sets minimum monthly reporting requirements for MEs and does not preclude the exercise by the Agency of its broad authority under section 31133(a)(8) to require more frequent and more inclusive reports. In addition to the general rulemaking authority in 49 U.S.C. 31136(a), the Secretary of Transportation is specifically authorized by section 31149(e) to “issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section.”

Authority to implement these various statutory provisions has been delegated to the Administrator of FMCSA (49 CFR 1.87(f)).

IV. Background

This final rule follows an SNPRM published on April 22, 2021 (86 FR 21259). The SNPRM relied upon the history of the regulations that FMCSA adopted in 2015 and the developments leading to the 2018 interim final rule (83 FR at 28776). The Agency also stated that it might further amend the provisions amended by the interim final rule (83 FR at 28777). Since issuing the 2015 final rule, there have been ongoing challenges associated with launching a new National Registry system. Among those challenges was an unsuccessful attempt by an intruder to compromise the National Registry in December 2017. Although no personal information was exposed, FMCSA took the National Registry system offline until mid-2018 to ensure it was secure. This action and other related actions affected the schedule for implementing the provisions of the 2015 final rule, resulting in the postponement of the compliance date by the 2018 IFR.

Since the 2018 IFR's publication, additional setbacks in FMCSA's efforts to launch a National Registry replacement system require an additional delay. The Agency attempted to launch the first stage of a replacement system in May 2019 but the system's performance capabilities fell short of those needed to implement the 2015 final rule. After a detailed analysis of the functional requirements, the Agency issued a request for proposals to obtain the services of a new contractor and selected a vendor in December 2020 to develop a replacement system by early 2022. The work includes delivery of technical specifications to the SDLAs for use in implementing changes to their respective systems.

FMCSA anticipates that the SDLAs will need up to 3 years following the completion and release of the new National Registry system and its technical specifications to develop and implement those changes. This was the same amount of time allowed for this activity in the 2015 final rule and the 2018 IFR.

V. Discussion of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments

A. Background and Proposed Rulemaking

The SNPRM proposed delaying the compliance date through June 22, 2025, specifically proposing that:

• Certified MEs continue issuing MECs to qualified CLP/CDL applicants/holders;
• CLP/CDL applicants/holders continue to provide the SDLA a copy of their MEC;
• Motor carriers continue verifying that drivers were certified by an ME listed on the National Registry; and
• SDLAs continue processing paper copies of MECs they receive from CLP/CDL applicants/holders.

In the previous 2018 IFR, FMCSA did not delay the requirement for MEs performing physical examinations of CMV drivers to report results of all CMV drivers' physical examinations to FMCSA by midnight (local time) of the next calendar day following the examination. MEs' submission of reports by midnight of the next calendar day also allows FMCSA to begin electronically transmitting this important safety data to each State when that State is ready to receive the information, thereby providing States additional flexibility to implement the provisions of this rulemaking at their own pace. In the SNPRM, FMCSA stated that it believed some States may be prepared to receive this data ahead of the June 23, 2025, date to take advantage of the efficiencies and added security the new process affords.

When FMCSA is ready to begin electronically transmitting MEC information from the National Registry, and an SDLA is ready to begin receiving this information electronically from the National Registry, FMCSA will work with the SDLA involved on the most appropriate means to use such electronic transmissions. In the SNPRM, FMCSA stated that, under such circumstances, electronic transmission of the MEC information may be an acceptable means for CDL and CLP holders to satisfy the requirement of providing the MEC to the SDLA. In order to avoid any uncertainty, provisions were previously added to the appropriate regulations stating that, in case of a conflict between the medical certification information provided electronically by FMCSA and information on a paper version of the MEC, the electronic record will be controlling. The provisions in the regulations governing the handling of these matters under the current procedures will remain in effect through June 22, 2025, to ensure continued compliance by SDLAs and other affected stakeholders until the electronic transmission of MEC information is operational for all SDLAs.

In the SNPRM, FMCSA stated that if any SDLAs begin receiving MEC information from FMCSA prior to June 23, 2025, FMCSA and the SDLAs will make every effort to advise all stakeholders when such transmission begins. MEs listed on the National Registry, employers, and enforcement personnel (both State and Federal) will need to be made fully aware that some SDLAs may be following procedures different from the remaining States.

In 49 CFR parts 383, 384, and 391, FMCSA proposed changing the compliance dates of the rules as shown in the table below.

B. Comments and Responses

FMCSA provided a period of 30 days ending May 24, 2021, for public comment regarding its intentions to finalize the compliance dates for the regulations listed above. FMCSA specifically sought input on whether the 3-year period for SDLA implementation is appropriate, or could even be reduced. In the SNPRM, the Agency stated its intention to publish the necessary final rule with the extended compliance dates as soon as feasible.

FMCSA received six comments on the SNPRM from the following parties: One anonymous individual; Mr. Dave Gray (who self-identified as the Past President of North American Transportation Services Association); the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA); the American Trucking Associations (ATA); the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB); and the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA).

Timeline. Most of the commenters discussed the timeline for implementation in their comments to the SNPRM. ATA accepted that there would be a delay, stating it was inevitable.

NTSB acknowledged that some delay was necessary, but said that the Agency should focus resources to implement the full system by “at the latest . . . June 22, 2023.”

AAMVA supported the modified timeline and stated they would need more time to implement, listing activities and contracting concerns that would require at least 12 months “from contract start.” AAMVA also said that “the time needed to make changes to the CDLIS record and history record messages should be considered.”

Response. FMCSA continues to believe that the delay is needed. It will provide the Agency time to complete the development of the National Registry replacement IT system, work with AAMVA and the SDLAs on the development of the interface to enable the electronic exchange of drivers' medical certificate information, and to establish that everything functions correctly. FMCSA is fully committed to dedicating resources to completing implementation of all remaining elements of the 2015 final rule as quickly as possible.

FMCSA will continue to drive the effort, in consultation with AAMVA, to develop a system that is suitable to process the electronic transfer of certification results to the SDLAs, while focusing on the deadline. FMCSA will work with SDLAs that want to use the information exchange prior to the 2025 date. The Agency will likely utilize consultations with the CDLIS Working Group to identify the SDLAs that have such an interest.

Mr. Gray recommends in his comment that FMCSA establish an “interim step” to implement the transmission of medical certification information to the SDLAs. As explained above in the response to the comments from AAMVA, FMCSA will work with any SDLAs that want to implement the information exchange prior to the 2025 compliance date, if it is feasible to do so.

Communication. Several commenters, including ATA and OOIDA, asked for better communication and information from the Agency regarding future policy changes. ATA specifically requested that FMCSA notify SDLAs that they may implement the changes ahead of the deadline. AAMVA listed activities that it had concerns or questions about, and requested confirmation that the work their organization has done with FMCSA will be utilized.

Response. FMCSA will continue to provide guidance and updates available to SDLAs via bi-monthly CDL roundtable meetings. FMCSA also plans to increase communication upon the issuance of this rule by providing regular updates on the National Registry website regarding the rebuild of the National Registry and implementation of any interim electronic transmission of examination results to the SDLAs. Additionally, FMCSA plans to coordinate and work closely with AAMVA and its members to allay their concerns.

FMCSA assures AAMVA and its members that the past work will be the basis for the ongoing effort and that communication will be open. FMCSA plans to utilize the specifications previously developed, with input from AAMVA, to the fullest extent possible in the National Registry rebuild effort.

FMCSA agrees with ATA's comment and will ensure that SDLAs are aware that they may begin compliance voluntarily before the deadline with support of the Agency.

Safety. NTSB stated that the delay was negatively impacting safety, based on the fact that crashes they have investigated have been linked to medical issues.

Response. FMCSA assures NTSB that safety remains the Agency's primary focus. FMCSA emphasizes that this delay is primarily to allow the implementation with the SDLAs in the electronic transmission processes that will be available with the development and implementation of the robust National Registry system. The medical standards under 49 CFR part 391 for drivers are still required, and the Medical Examiners continue to examine and qualify or disqualify drivers, as appropriate. Though the full implementation of the rule will automate some data entry by the SDLAs that is currently manual, and will therefore minimize resources and make the process smoother, the system will still require the same medical qualifications for all commercial drivers. Prevention of fraud is an underlying purpose of the National Registry system, as modified by the 2015 final rule, which will be fully implemented as soon as possible.

The anonymous commenter suggested that “A driver who does not pass a DOT physical . . . should have all remaining time on his/her current medical card be made invalid.” The issue raised by this comment was covered in the final rule adopted in 2015. The regulations in 49 CFR 391.41(g)(3) and 391.45(g) state that, if a driver is found not to be physically qualified upon examination by an ME, that determination is reported to FMCSA and any existing and unexpired certificates held by the driver are no longer valid. Such a determination, for CDL and CLP license holders, would then have to be electronically transmitted to the appropriate SDLA by FMCSA for action to indicate on the driver record that the driver is not certified and begin the license downgrade process under 49 CFR part 383. Because the IT infrastructure was, and is still, unavailable, these two provisions were among the many whose implementation was postponed from 2018 to 2021. These provisions are again postponed by this final rule.

Clarifications. AAMVA requested that FMCSA confirm that CDLIS/AAMVAnet should be used for transmission. AAMVA also “request[ed] confirmation that no additional medical information” needs to be posted to CDLIS.

Response. FMCSA confirms that it did not intend to introduce new substantive proposals in the SNPRM, as this proposal was intended only to delay the compliance date, and not to modify the April 23, 2015 Medical Examiner's Certification Integration final rule. FMCSA will work with AAMVA to make the delay as seamless as possible for SDLAs. FMCSA does note that AAMVA indicates in its comments that it is changing or replacing some of the systems that it previously contemplated using to perform the information exchange with FMCSA. These actions may inhibit FMCSA's ability to utilize processes previously developed for such exchange through AAMVANet.

VI. Good Cause Considerations

Under the Administrative Procedure Act, upon a finding of good cause, the Agency may provide for a final rule to become effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)). The necessary IT infrastructure to enable stakeholders to comply with the regulatory provisions involved will not be available on June 21, 2021. Under these circumstances, and in order to clarify the applicable regulatory requirements in a timely manner, FMCSA finds that there is good cause to issue this final rule with an immediate effective date. The time for comments ended on May 24, 2021. There remains insufficient time to prepare and publish this final rule to permit an effective date 30 days after publication. Therefore, the Agency makes this final rule effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register.

VII. International Impacts

Motor carriers and drivers are subject to the laws and regulations of the countries in which they operate, unless an international agreement states otherwise. Drivers and carriers should be aware of the regulatory differences among nations.

VIII. Changes From the SNPRM

FMCSA moves forward with a final rule as proposed in the SNPRM, with no modifications.

IX. Section-By-Section Analysis

This section-by-section analysis describes the proposed changes in numerical order.

Parts 383, 384, and 391

In parts 383, 384, and 391, FMCSA modifies the compliance dates as stated in Table 1. FMCSA does not make any other changes in this final rule.

X. Regulatory Analyses

A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O. 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures

FMCSA has considered the impact of this final rule under E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), Regulatory Planning and Review, E.O. 13563 (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011), Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and DOT's regulatory policies and procedures. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) determined that this final rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866, as supplemented by E.O. 13563, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it under these Orders.

The Medical Examiner's Certification Integration Final Rule, published April 23, 2015 (80 FR 22790), amended the FMCSRs to establish a streamlined process for SDLAs to receive CMV driver physical examination results from the MEs, via the National Registry. The 2015 final rule estimated that the National Registry would be able to receive and transmit this information on a daily basis by June 22, 2018, and established compliance dates for MEs, motor carriers, FMCSA, and the States accordingly. This final rule delays until June 23, 2025, the compliance date requiring (1) FMCSA to electronically transmit from the National Registry to the SDLAs driver identification information, examination results, and restriction information from examinations performed for holders of CLPs/CDLs (interstate and intrastate); (2) FMCSA to electronically transmit to the SDLAs medical variance information for all CMV drivers; (3) SDLAs to post driver identification, examination results, and restriction information received electronically from FMCSA; and (4) that motor carriers no longer would need to verify that their drivers holding CLPs or CDLs were certified by an ME listed on the National Registry. This action is being taken to ensure that SDLAs have sufficient time to make the necessary IT programming changes. Although this rule would impact the responsibilities of MEs, CMV drivers, motor carriers, SDLAs, and FMCSA, it is not expected to generate any economic costs or benefits.

The 2015 final rule accounted for costs associated with system development and implementation, and benefits associated with streamlined processes and reduced paperwork. These costs and benefits (anticipated under the 2018 IFR to be realized on the compliance date of June 22, 2021) would not be realized on that date. Therefore, the baseline against which to evaluate the impacts of this final rule is that the necessary systems will not be ready on June 22, 2021, and will instead be ready on June 23, 2025. This rule aligns the compliance date with the date when the systems will be ready and thus, when the costs and benefits estimated in the 2015 final rule can be realized.

B. Congressional Review Act

Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808), OIRA designated this rule as not a “major rule.”

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of the regulatory action on small business and other small entities and to minimize any significant economic impact. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses and not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000 (5 U.S.C. 601(6)). Accordingly, DOT policy requires an analysis of the impact of all regulations on small entities, and mandates that agencies strive to lessen any adverse effects on these businesses.

FMCSA considers all of the 76,396 MEs who are certified and listed on the National Registry to be small entities. While this may be a substantial number of small entities, this rule does not impose any new requirements on MEs. MEs are already required, under the 2015 final rule, to report results of all CMV drivers' physical examinations (including the results of examinations where the driver was found not to be qualified) to FMCSA by midnight (local time) of the next calendar day following the examination. In addition, this rule does not result in additional costs or benefits, nor does it inhibit the realization of the cost savings identified in the 2015 final rule. The unanticipated National Registry outage and subsequent IT development issues have led to delays in the development of the process for the electronic transmission of MEC information and medical variances, and the final specifications have not yet been published and released to the SDLAs. This rule aligns the compliance date with the date when the systems will be ready and thus, when the costs and benefits estimated in the 2015 final rule can be realized. As such, this rule will not result in a significant economic impact on the MEs.

CMV drivers are not considered small entities because they do not meet the definition of a small entity in Section 601 of the RFA. Specifically, CMV drivers are considered neither a small business under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601(3)), nor are they considered a small organization under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601(4)}.

All motor carriers will likely be impacted by this rule; however, the rule would impose no new obligations. FMCSA does not know how many of these motor carriers are considered “small.” The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) defines the size standards used to classify entities as small. SBA establishes separate standards for each industry, as defined by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). This rule may affect many different industry sectors; for example, the transportation sector (e.g., general freight trucking industry group (4841) and the specialized freight trucking industry group (4842)), the agricultural sector (11), and the construction sector (23). Industry groups within these sectors have size standards based on the number of employees, or on the amount of annual revenue. Regardless of how many small entities are in this population, this rule is not expected to generate any economic costs or benefits. Therefore, FMCSA estimates that, while this rule as proposed may affect a substantial number of small entities, it will not have a significant impact on those entities.

This rule directly affects the States through their SDLAs. Under the standards of the RFA, as amended by the SBREFA, the States are not small entities. States are not considered small entities because they do not meet the definition of a small entity in the RFA. Specifically, States are not considered small governmental jurisdictions under the RFA 5 U.S.C. 601(5), both because State government is not included among the various levels of government listed in Section 601(5), and because, even if this were the case, no State, including the District of Columbia, has a population of less than 50,000, which is the criterion for a governmental jurisdiction to be considered small under the RFA.

Consequently, I hereby certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

D. Assistance for Small Entities

In accordance with section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, FMCSA wants to assist small entities in understanding this final rule so they can better evaluate its effects on themselves and participate in the rulemaking initiative. If the rule will affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance; please consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal regulations to the Small Business Administration's Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of FMCSA, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). DOT has a policy regarding the rights of small entities to regulatory enforcement fairness and an explicit policy against retaliation for exercising these rights.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. The Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $168 million (which is the value equivalent of $100 million in 1995, adjusted for inflation to 2019 levels) or more in any 1 year. Though this final rule would not result in such an expenditure, the Agency does discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule contains no new information collection requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

G. E.O. 13132 (Federalism)

A rule has implications for federalism under section 1(a) of E.O. 13132 if it has “substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.”

FMCSA has determined that this rule will not have substantial direct costs on or for States, nor would it limit the policymaking discretion of States. Nothing in this document preempts any State law or regulation. Therefore, this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Impact Statement.

H. Privacy

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, requires the Agency to assess the privacy impact of a regulation that will affect the privacy of individuals. This final rule would not require the collection of personally identifiable information (PII).

The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) applies only to Federal agencies and any non-Federal agency that receives records contained in a system of records from a Federal agency for use in a matching program.

The E-Government Act of 2002, requires Federal agencies to conduct a PIA for new or substantially changed technology that collects, maintains, or disseminates information in an identifiable form.

No new or substantially changed technology would collect, maintain, or disseminate information as a result of this rule. Accordingly, FMCSA has not conducted a PIA.

I. E.O. 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)

This rule does not have Tribal implications under E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

J. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

FMCSA analyzed this final rule for the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and determined this action is categorically excluded from further analysis and documentation in an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under FMCSA Order 5610.1 (69 FR 9680), Appendix 2, paragraph (s)(7) and paragraph (t)(2). The Categorical Exclusion (CE) in paragraph (s)(7) covers requirements for State-issued commercial license documentation and paragraph (t)(2) addresses regulations that ensure States have the appropriate information systems and procedures concerning CDL qualifications. The content in this final rule is covered by these CEs and the final action does not have any effect on the quality of the environment.

List of Subjects

49 CFR Part 383

• Administrative practice and procedure
• Alcohol abuse
• Drug abuse
• Highway safety
• Motor carriers

49 CFR Part 384

• Administrative practice and procedure
• Alcohol abuse
• Drug abuse
• Highway safety
• Motor carriers

49 CFR Part 391

• Alcohol abuse
• Drug abuse
• Drug testing
• Highway safety
• Motor carriers
• Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
• Safety
• Transportation

In consideration of the foregoing, FMCSA amends 49 CFR subtitle B, chapter III, parts 383, 384, and 391 to read as follows:

PART 383—COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE STANDARDS; REQUIREMENTS AND PENALTIES

1. The authority citation for part 383 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et seq., and 31502; secs. 214 and 215 of Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767; sec. 1012(b) of Pub. L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272, 297, sec. 4140 of Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1746; sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; secs. 5401 and 7208 of Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1546, 1593; and 49 CFR 1.87.

2. Amend § 383.71 by revising paragraphs (h)(1) and (3) to read as follows:

3. Amend § 383.73 by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(vii), (b)(5), (o)(1)(i) introductory text, (o)(1)(ii) introductory text, (o)(2), (o)(3), (o)(4)(i)(A), and (o)(4)(ii) to read as follows:

PART 384—STATE COMPLIANCE WITH COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE PROGRAM

4. The authority citation for part 384 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136, 31301, et seq., and 31502; secs. 103 and 215 of Pub. L. 106-59, 113 Stat. 1753, 1767; sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; secs. 5401 and 7208 of Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1546, 1593 and 49 CFR 1.87.

5. Amend § 384.301 by revising paragraph (i) to read as follows:

PART 391—QUALIFICATIONS OF DRIVERS AND LONGER COMBINATION VEHICLE (LCV) DRIVER INSTRUCTORS

6. The authority citation for part 391 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 508, 31133, 31136, 31149, and 31502; sec. 4007(b), Pub. L. 102-240, 105 Stat. 1914, 2152; sec. 114, Pub. L. 103-311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1677; sec. 215, Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1767; sec. 32934, Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; secs. 5403 and 5524, Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1548, 1560; sec. 2, Pub. L. 115-105, 131 Stat. 2263; and 49 CFR 1.87.

7. Amend § 391.23 by revising paragraphs (m)(2)(i)(B)( 1), (m)(2)(i)(C), (m)(3)(i)(B)(1) and (m)(3)(i)(C), to read as follows:

8. Amend § 391.41 by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii), to read as follows:

9. Amend § 391.43 by revising paragraphs (g)(2) and (3) to read as follows:

10. Amend § 391.45 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows:

11. Amend § 391.51 by revising paragraphs (b)(7)(ii) and (b)(9)(ii) to read as follows:

Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87.