In re R----A

Board of Immigration AppealsJan 19, 2005
23 I&N Dec. 694 (B.I.A. 2005)

Cases citing this document

How cited

  • Hong Ying Gao v. Gonzales

    Id. at 27-28. The Attorney General remanded the case to the BIA in January 2005, see Matter of R-A-. 23 I. …

  • De Pena-Paniagua v. Barr

    As DHS itself once observed, the "sustained physical abuse of [a] slave undoubtedly could constitute…

2 Citing cases

Decided by Attorney General January 19, 2005. Decided by Attorney General January 19, 2001. Decided by Board June 11, 1999.

The Attorney General's January 19, 2001, and the Board's June 11, 1999, decisions in this case were published as Matter of R----A----, 22 IN Dec. 906 (A.G. 2001; BIA 1999).

FOR APPLICANT: Jane B. Kroesche, Esquire, and Karen Musalo, Esquire, San Francisco, California

FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Joe D. Whitley, General Counsel

BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL



BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

(January 19, 2005)

The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for reconsideration following final publication of the proposed rule published at 65 Fed. Reg. 76,588 (Dec. 7, 2000). The BIA should reconsider the decision in light of the final rule.