S.D. Codified Laws § 49-32-3

Current through the 2024 Legislative Session
Section 49-32-3 - Moving structures across or under utility's lines-Notice to utility-Deposit for costs

Section 49-32-2 does not apply to the lawful moving of any structure along or across any public highway by a person who has used all necessary means to prevent injury to a utility's lines and who:

(1) Provides no less than forty-eight hours notice, which notice shall be calculated as two working days of the utility, of his intention to move a structure under or across a utility's lines to the nearest managing agent of the utility which owns the lines that must be moved;
(2) Informs the utility of the approximate time he intends to move the structure under or across the utility's lines; and
(3) Renders in advance of the move a reasonable deposit to the utility which shall equal the utility's estimated cost of its expenses in moving any lines.

The deposit shall include the utility's reasonable direct costs of all labor, materials and equipment, not including profit or common overhead costs, associated with accommodating the structure move. After the movement of the structure has been completed, the utility shall refund any deposit given in excess of the utility's direct cost incurred in moving its lines or the utility may bill the person moving the structure for the utility's direct cost incurred in excess of the deposit. The utility shall provide the person moving the structure with an itemized estimate when requiring a deposit and an itemized bill accounting for all direct costs after the move has been completed. No utility may charge any cost for monitoring the movement of a structure under its lines if it is not required to remove or lift any utility lines. No utility may require, as a condition precedent to the move, that a mover or the party owning the structure being moved sign a contract which adds terms regarding the movement of the structure inconsistent with this section.

SDCL 49-32-3

SDC 1939, § 13.4520; SL 1987, ch 345, § 87; SL 1992, ch 329.