If the juvenile challenges the state's determination of the juvenile's criminal history under (e)(v) of this subsection, the state may establish the offender's criminal history by a preponderance of the evidence. If the criminal history consists of adjudications entered upon a plea of guilty, the state shall not bear a burden of establishing the knowing and voluntariness of the plea;
RCW 13.04.030
Reviser's note: *(1) RCW 13.04.0301 was decodified September 2003.
(2) This section was amended by 2024 c 117 s 3 and by 2024 c 232 s 2, each without reference to the other. Both amendments are incorporated in the publication of this section under RCW 1.12.025(2). For rule of construction, see RCW 1.12.025(1).
Application- 2024 c 117 : See note following RCW 13.40.300.
Findings-Intent- 2019 c 322 : See note following RCW 72.01.410.
Effective date- 2018 c 162 s s 2 and 7: "Sections 2 and 7 of this act take effect July 1, 2019." [2018 c 162 s 11.]
Expiration date- 2018 c 162 s s 1 and 6: "Sections 1 and 6 of this act expire July 1, 2019." [2018 c 162 s 10.]
Effective date-2017 3rd sp.s. c 6 ss 601-631, 701-728, and 804: See note following RCW 13.04.011.
Conflict with federal requirements-2017 3rd sp.s. c 6: See RCW 43.216.908.
Application-1997 c 386: See note following RCW 13.50.010.
Finding-Intent-1997 c 341: "The legislature finds that a swift and certain response to a juvenile who begins engaging in acts of delinquency may prevent the offender from becoming a chronic or more serious offender. However, given pressing demands to address serious offenders, the system does not always respond to minor offenders expeditiously and effectively. Consequently, this act is adopted to implement an experiment to determine whether granting courts of limited jurisdiction concurrent jurisdiction over certain juvenile offenses will improve the system's effectiveness in curbing delinquency. The legislature may ascertain whether this approach might be successful on a larger scale by conducting an experiment with local governments, which are the laboratories of democracy." [ 1997 c 341 s 1.]
Finding-Evaluation-Report-1997 c 338: See note following RCW 13.40.0357.
Severability-Effective dates-1997 c 338: See notes following RCW 5.60.060.
Short title-1995 c 312: See note following RCW 13.32A.010.
Application of 1994 sp.s. c 7 amendments: "Provisions governing exceptions to juvenile court jurisdiction in the amendments to RCW 13.04.030 contained in section 519, chapter 7, Laws of 1994 sp. sess. shall apply to serious violent and violent offenses committed on or after June 13, 1994. The criminal history which may result in loss of juvenile court jurisdiction upon the alleged commission of a serious violent or violent offense may have been acquired on, before, or after June 13, 1994." [ 1994 sp.s. c 7 s 540.]
Finding-Intent-Severability-Effective dates-Contingent expiration date-1994 sp.s. c 7: See notes following RCW 43.70.540.
Savings-1988 c 14: "Any court validation of a voluntary consent to relinquishment or adoption of an Indian child which was obtained in a juvenile court or superior court pursuant to chapter 26.33 RCW after July 25, 1987, and before June 9, 1988, shall be valid and effective in all respects." [ 1988 c 14 s 2.]
Severability-1987 c 170: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1987 c 170 s 15.]
Effective date-Severability-1980 c 128: See notes following RCW 46.63.060.
Effective date-Severability-1979 c 155: See notes following RCW 13.04.011.
Effective dates-Severability-1977 ex.s. c 291: See notes following RCW 13.04.005.
Court commissioners: Chapter 2.24 RCW, state Constitution Art. 4 s 23.
Jurisdiction of superior courts: State Constitution Art. 4 s 6 (Amendment 65).