Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 1-9-620
Oklahoma Code Comment
Sections 9-620, 9-621, and 9-622 expand and substantially revise former section 9-505 . Significant changes codified in section 9-620 include:
A definition for the term "proposal" has been added; the definition is codified in section 9-102(a)(66) :
Section 9-620 adds terms explicitly providing for acceptance of the collateral in partial satisfaction of the obligation, ( section 9-620(a)), but for a partial satisfaction to be valid, the debtor must agree in a record authenticated after default, ( section 9-620(c)(1)). In the case of real property, it appears that a transfer of mortgaged real property to the mortgagee may have to be in full satisfaction of the secured obligation see Morrow Development Corporation v. American Bank and Trust, 875 p.2d 411 (Okla.1994); Fisk v. Kundert, 440 p.2d 690(Okla.1968)], but section 9-620 makes it clear that a personal property secured party may accept collateral in either full or partial satisfaction of the secured obligation so long as the other conditions of this section are met; in a consumer transaction, however, the secured party is precluded from accepting collateral in partial satisfaction of the obligation, section 9-620(g) .
Section 9-620 eliminates the requirement that the secured party be in possession of the collateral, but if the collateral is consumer goods, the collateral cannot be in the possession of the debtor when the debtor consents to the acceptance, ( section 9-620(a)(3) ).
Section 9-620 codifies in great detail the requirements for a valid acceptance of collateral in full or partial satisfaction of the obligation it secures.
Section 9-620 specifies time limits for objections to proposals to accept collateral in full or partial satisfaction of the obligation it secures, and reduces the days limit from 21 to 20 days, ( section 9-620(d) ).
Section 9-620(b) precludes a "constructive" strict foreclosure. See Comment 5. This rule changes current Oklahoma Law. See Farmers State Bank v. Ballew, 626 p.2d 337 (Okla. App. 1981), where the court stated that retention or use of collateral over an extended period of time after repossession may result in a satisfaction of the debt; and
Section 9-620(e)-(f) retains compulsory disposition of the collateral for certain consumer transactions, but subsection (f) allows a period greater than 90 days for disposition where the debtor and all secondary obligors agree to a longer period after default.