Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 2A-508
Oklahoma Code Comment
This section, as the Official Comment indicates, is an index to the lessee's remedies for a default by the lessor. For that reason subsection (4) is a proper inclusion as it cites a remedy provided in § 2A-519(4) which is available when the goods have been accepted, and the remedies cited in subsection (1) are available when the goods have not been accepted or acceptance has been revoked. Thus, the Official Comment to subsection (4) appears to provide an erroneous explanation when it indicates subsection (4) is included to cover the situation where a breach of warranty does not constitute a default. As explained in the Oklahoma Comment to § 2A-501, breach of warranty involves a statutorily defined default under subsection (1). See also §§ 2A-509 and 2A-103(1)(d).
The remedies of the lessee under Article 2A are much more extensive than those provided under 15 Oklahoma Statutes § 538 (repealed by H.B.1683 enacting Article 2A) and the general damage rule of 23 Oklahoma Statutes § 21 and related provisions (displaced for leases to the extent inconsistent with Article 2A). Presumably a lessee could have contracted for remedies in the lease as well, although such instances would be reasonably uncommon as most leases are lessor products. Thus Article 2A makes a major contribution by providing a complete remedy structure for lessees, except to the extent modified by agreement.
The 1991 amendments make two basic changes to this section: to provide a statutory remedy for contractual defaults absent a contractual remedy, and to clarify the lease can contract for the remedies of Article 2A for statutory defaults for contractual defaults.