have duly filed or caused to be filed their protests against the granting of the license, or if there appears any other disqualification under this chapter, the application shall be refused. Otherwise, the commission may in its discretion grant or refuse the same.
For purposes of defining "a majority of the owners and lessees of record of real estate and owners of record of shares in a cooperative apartment", each property counts only once; provided that roadways shall not be included. A protest submitted by the majority of the co-owners or the majority of the co-lessees of a property shall constitute a protest by all the owners or lessees of record of that property. A protest filed by owners or lessees who own more than one property shall be counted for each property.
provided that in any case where any person affected by such decision petitions the commission for a rehearing of the application and on oath alleges facts and grounds for consideration which were not formerly presented or considered, or any other matter of fact which in the judgment of the commission seems sufficient to warrant a rehearing, such rehearing may be granted by the commission in its discretion upon the publication of notice of rehearing at least seven days before the date of the rehearing. When a rehearing is allowed notice shall be given to the applicant and to the applicant's opponents, by publication or otherwise as the commission shall direct.
HRS § 281-59
Based on a plain and unambiguous reading of this section, a majority of co-owners or co-lessees must register a protest in order for that property to be counted as one protest vote; thus, even if commission were to have counted the two protest votes that were disallowed, the two added votes would not have resulted in a majority vote nullifying the liquor license application.111 Haw. 234,140 P.3d 1014. State and county entities, as owners of real property, are included as owners for both notice and protest purposes as set forth under § 281-57 and this section.111 Haw. 234,140 P.3d 1014. The State and county governments fall within the definition of "owner of record" under this section as property owners of real estate.111 Haw. 234,140 P.3d 1014. As it is possible to give effect to § 91-11 and this section insofar as a public hearing on a license application must be regarded as a contested case subject to the requirements of chapter 91, this section does not conflict with § 91-11.118 Haw. 320,189 P.3d 432. Public hearings on liquor license applications held by the liquor commission are contested case hearings such that § 91-11 requires any commissioner who is not present at any stage of the public hearing to become familiar with the record before voting on a liquor license application, unless the application is automatically rejected pursuant to subsection (a).118 Haw. 320,189 P.3d 432. The liquor commission's failure to comply with § 91-11, requiring that all commissioners personally consider the entire record before voting on a liquor license application, was not a "failure to act" such as would trigger the automatic approval provision of § 91-13.5 where the liquor commission voted, albeit ineffectively, within the fifteen day period prescribed by this section.118 Haw. 320,189 P.3d 432.
Administrative hearings, see chapter 91.