To the extent that the authorization to operate thrill craft pursuant to this subsection is inconsistent with any other law, including section 200-38, this subsection shall control.
on or above the waters of the State, except on or above areas and during time periods designated by the department.
in the waters of the State, except in areas and during time periods designated by the department.
HRS § 200-37
L 1996, c 258, §§3 and 4 as amended by L 1998, c 4, §4 provides:
"SECTION 3. This Act [amending section 200-37 ] shall not apply to existing permits issued by the department of land and natural resources pursuant to section 200-39, Hawaii Revised Statutes.
SECTION 4. This Act [amending section 200-37 ] shall take effect upon its approval [June 18, 1996]; provided that the term of each commercial use and operator permit validly issued as of the effective date of this Act [June 18, 1996] shall be extended by the department to conform with this Act if the permit holder:
(1) Is in compliance with applicable rules of the department;
(2) Has timely filed and paid all applicable state taxes during the year; and
(3) Has a good safety record regarding the operation of a commercial thrill craft or parasailing activity;
provided further that no permit validly issued as of the effective date shall be put up for public auction by operation of this Act until the end of the extended term of the permit."
Implementation of L 2009, c 89, §1 amendment; reports to legislature through 2014. L 2009, c 89, §3.
Revision Note
"June 18, 1996" substituted for "the effective date of this Act" in subsection (l).
Appellants' right to operate vessels under federal maritime coasting licenses did not preempt Hawaii law prohibiting parasailing off the coast of Maui during limited portions of the year to protect mating humpback whales; among other things, because the parasailing ban furthers the legitimate governmental purpose of protecting humpback whales, the statute is reasonable. 508 F.3d 1189. Defendants' motion for summary judgment granted, where, inter alia, plaintiffs argued that subsection (i) impermissibly restricted the coastwise trade of plaintiff's vessels in contravention of plaintiff's federal licenses. 380 F. Supp. 2d 1160. Subsection (i) and all rules and regulations derived from the statute are not preempted by the Marine Mammal Protection Act. 380 F. Supp. 2d 1166.