Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-60
(1969, P.A. 828, S. 61; 1971, P.A. 871, S. 18; P.A. 73-639, S. 20; P.A. 84-236, S. 4; P.A. 93-246, S. 3; July Sp. Sess. P.A. 94-2, S. 5; P.A. 04-234, S, 2; P.A. 14-220, S. 1; P.A. 15-211, S. 4; P.A. 16-193, S. 28.)
Illegal confinement is no defense to assault on correctional officer. 169 C. 438. Cited. 171 Conn. 264; 172 Conn. 275; 173 Conn. 254; 184 Conn. 157; Id., 520; 193 Conn. 144; Id., 232; 197 Conn. 602; 198 Conn. 23; 199 Conn. 146; 216 C. 647; 222 C. 331; 231 Conn. 545; 237 C. 238. Cited. 5 Conn.App. 590; Id., 612; 7 Conn.App. 701; 12 Conn.App. 221; Id., 320; Id., 679; 13 CA 667; 17 Conn.App. 200; 20 Conn.App. 75; 24 Conn.App. 13; 32 Conn.App. 224; 34 CA 1; 35 Conn.App. 138; Id., 431; 36 Conn.App. 59; 37 Conn.App. 338; 38 CA 598; 46 Conn.App. 486; Id., 691; Id., 741. Cited. 34 Conn.Supp. 531. Subsec. (a): Cited. 171 C. 395; 175 Conn. 155; 185 Conn. 63; 188 Conn. 574; 190 C. 143; 193 Conn. 48; 194 Conn. 119; Id., 408; 195 C. 636; Id., 651; 198 C. 405; Id., 424; 199 C. 322; 201 C. 103; Id., 289; 202 Conn. 520; 204 Conn. 207; Id., 714; 209 Conn. 733; 211 Conn. 151; 220 Conn. 385; 221 Conn. 447; 222 Conn. 556; 223 Conn. 243; 226 C. 618; 227 Conn. 153; Id., 711; Id., 751; 228 Conn. 147; Id., 910; 230 C. 591; 235 C. 748; 239 Conn. 481. Cited. 1 CA 584; 5 Conn.App. 40; 6 Conn.App. 701; 7 Conn.App. 27; Id., 95; Id., 377; 8 CA 35; 9 Conn.App. 161; 10 CA 50; Id., 330; Id., 462; 11 Conn.App. 665; 13 CA 386; 14 CA 463; Id., 472; Id., 493; Id., 586; 15 Conn.App. 586; Id., 704; 17 Conn.App. 226; 19 CA 245; Id., 576; Id., 618; 20 Conn.App. 27; 22 CA 586; 23 CA 83; Id., 447; Id., 502; Id., 705; 24 CA 264; Id., 563; Id., 624; Id., 685; 25 Conn.App. 104; Id., 275; Id., 565; 26 CA 114; Id., 145; Id., 242; 27 Conn.App. 73; Id., 322; 28 Conn.App. 290; Id., 645; 29 Conn.App. 262; 30 Conn.App. 95; judgment reversed, see 228 Conn. 147; 31 Conn.App. 58; Id., 140; Id., 448; 33 CA 647; 34 CA 691; 36 CA 641; Id., 805; 37 CA 437; 38 CA 247; Id., 777; Id., 868; 39 CA 789; 40 CA 757; 41 Conn.App. 47; Id., 333; Id., 515; Id., 565; 43 Conn.App. 205; Id., 252; 44 CA 125; Id., 307; 45 Conn.App. 591; 46 CA 24. Defendant's rights under double jeopardy clause of fifth amendment to U.S. Constitution were violated by his conviction of two counts of assault in the second degree resulting from conduct against one victim that was nonsexual, continuous, uninterrupted and close in time. 92 CA 586. Subdiv. (1): The question of intent is purely a question of fact and intent may be inferred from conduct, and whether such an inference should be drawn is a question for the jury to decide. 118 CA 315. Cited. 39 Conn.Supp. 494. It is possible to prove assault in the second degree without necessarily proving risk of injury pursuant to Sec. 53-21(a), so assault in the second degree and risk of injury do not stand in relationship to each other as greater and lesser offenses. 48 CS 610.