(a) Any person who operates a motor vehicle in this state shall be deemed to have given such person's consent to: (1) A chemical test of such person's blood, breath or urine; and (2) a nontestimonial portion of a drug influence evaluation conducted by a drug recognition expert. If such person is a minor, such person's parent or parents or guardian shall also be deemed to have given their consent for such test or evaluation. As used in this section, "motor vehicle" includes a snowmobile and all-terrain vehicle, as such terms are defined in section 14-379.(b)(1) A police officer who has placed a person under arrest for a violation of section 14-227a, 14-227m or subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section 14-227n may request that such person submit to a blood, breath or urine test at the option of the police officer, a drug influence evaluation conducted by a drug recognition expert, or both, after such person has been (A) apprised of such person's constitutional rights; (B) afforded a reasonable opportunity to telephone an attorney prior to the performance of such test or evaluation; (C) informed that evidence of any refusal to submit to such test or evaluation shall be admissible in accordance with subsection (e) of section 14-227a and may be used against such person in any criminal prosecution, except that refusal to submit to the testimonial portions of a drug influence evaluation shall not be considered evidence of refusal of such evaluation for purposes of any criminal prosecution; and (D) informed that such person's license or operating privilege may be suspended in accordance with the provisions of this section if (i) such person refuses to submit to such test or the nontestimonial portion of a drug influence evaluation, (ii) such person submits to such test and the results of such test indicate that such person has an elevated blood alcohol content, or (iii) the officer concludes, through investigation, that such person was operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both.(2) If the person refuses to submit to any test or drug influence evaluation, the test or evaluation shall not be given, except if the person refuses or is unable to submit to a blood test, the police officer shall designate another test to be taken. If a person submits to a breath test and the police officer, for reasonable cause, requests an additional chemical test of a different type to detect the presence of a drug or drugs other than or in addition to alcohol, the officer may administer such test, except that if such person refuses or is unable to submit to a blood test, the officer shall designate a urine test to be taken. The police officer shall make a notation upon the records of the law enforcement unit, as defined in section 7-294a, that such officer informed the person that such person's license or operating privilege may be suspended if (A) such person refused to submit to such test or nontestimonial portion of a drug influence evaluation; (B) such person submitted to such test and the results of such test indicated that such person had an elevated blood alcohol content; or (C) the officer concludes, through investigation, that such person was operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both.(c) If the person arrested refuses to submit to such test or nontestimonial portion of a drug influence evaluation or submits to such test, commenced within two hours of the time of operation, and the results of such test indicate that such person has an elevated blood alcohol content, the police officer, acting on behalf of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, shall immediately revoke and take possession of the motor vehicle operator's license or, if such person is not licensed or is a nonresident, suspend the operating privilege of such person, for a twenty-four-hour period. The police officer shall prepare a report of the incident and shall mail or otherwise transmit in accordance with this subsection the report and a copy of the results of any chemical test to the Department of Motor Vehicles within six business days. The report shall contain such information as prescribed by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles and shall be subscribed and sworn to under penalty of false statement as provided in section 53a-157b by the arresting officer. If the person arrested refused to submit to such test or evaluation, the report shall be endorsed by a third person who witnessed such refusal. The report shall set forth the grounds for the officer's belief that there was probable cause to arrest such person for a violation of section 14-227a or 14-227m or subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section 14-227n and shall state that such person had refused to submit to such test or evaluation when requested by such police officer to do so or that such person submitted to such test, commenced within two hours of the time of operation, and the results of such test indicated that such person had an elevated blood alcohol content. A drug influence evaluation need not be commenced within two hours of the time of operation. The Commissioner of Motor Vehicles may accept a police report under this subsection that is prepared and transmitted as an electronic record, including electronic signature or signatures, subject to such security procedures as the commissioner may specify and in accordance with the provisions of sections 1-266 to 1-286, inclusive. In any hearing conducted pursuant to the provisions of subsection (g) of this section, it shall not be a ground for objection to the admissibility of a police report that it is an electronic record prepared by electronic means.(d) If a police officer who has placed a person under arrest for a violation of section 14-227a or 14-227m or subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section 14-227n does not request that such person submit to a blood, breath or urine test under subsection (b) of this section, or obtains results from a test administered under subsection (b) of this section that indicate that the person does not have an elevated blood alcohol content, such officer shall: (1) Advise such person that such person's license or operating privilege may be suspended in accordance with the provisions of this section if such police officer concludes, through investigation, that such person was operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both; and(2) Submit a report to the commissioner in accordance with the procedure set forth in subsection (c) of this section and, if such report contains the results of a blood, breath or urine test that does not show an elevated blood alcohol content, such report shall conform to the requirements in subsection (c) of this section for reports that contain results showing an elevated blood alcohol content. In any report submitted under this subdivision, the officer shall document (A) the basis for the officer's belief that there was probable cause to arrest such person for a violation of section 14-227a or 14-227m or subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section 14-227n, and (B) whether the officer concluded, through investigation, that the person was operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both. With such report, the officer may submit other supporting documentation indicating the person's intoxication by liquor or any drug, or both. If the officer concludes, through investigation, that the person was operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both, the officer shall immediately revoke and take possession of the motor vehicle operator's license or, if such person is not licensed or is a nonresident, suspend the operating privilege of such person for a twenty-four-hour period.(e)(1) Except as provided in subdivision (2) of this subsection, upon receipt of a report submitted under subsection (c) or (d) of this section, the commissioner may suspend any operator's license or operating privilege of such person effective as of a date certain, which date certain shall be not later than thirty days from the later of the date such person received (A) notice of such person's arrest by the police officer, or (B) the results of a blood or urine test or a drug influence evaluation. Any person whose operator's license or operating privilege has been suspended in accordance with this subdivision shall automatically be entitled to a hearing before the commissioner to be held in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54 and prior to the effective date of the suspension. The commissioner shall send a suspension notice to such person informing such person that such person's operator's license or operating privilege is suspended as of a date certain and that such person is entitled to a hearing prior to the effective date of the suspension and may schedule such hearing by contacting the Department of Motor Vehicles not later than seven days after the date of mailing of such suspension notice.(2) Upon receipt of a report that (A) the person's arrest involved an accident resulting in a fatality, or (B) the person has previously had such person's operator's license or operating privilege suspended under the provisions of section 14-227a, 14-227m or 14-227n during the ten-year period preceding the present arrest, the commissioner may suspend any operator's license or operating privilege of such person effective as of the date specified in a notice of such suspension to such person. A person whose operator's license or operating privilege has been suspended in accordance with this subdivision shall automatically be entitled to a hearing before the commissioner, to be held in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54. The commissioner shall send a suspension notice to such person informing such person that such person's operator's license or operating privilege is suspended as of the date specified in such suspension notice, and that such person is entitled to a hearing and may schedule such hearing by contacting the Department of Motor Vehicles not later than seven days after the date of mailing of such suspension notice. Any suspension issued under this subdivision shall remain in effect until such suspension is affirmed under subsection (f) of this section or such operator's license or operating privilege is reinstated in accordance with subsection (h) of this section.(f) If such person does not contact the department to schedule a hearing, the commissioner shall affirm the suspension contained in the suspension notice for the appropriate period specified in subsection (i) of this section.(g)(1) If such person contacts the department to schedule a hearing, the department shall assign a date, time and place for the hearing, which date shall be prior to the effective date of the suspension, except that, with respect to a person whose operator's license or operating privilege is suspended in accordance with subdivision (2) of subsection (e) of this section, such hearing shall be scheduled not later than thirty days after such person contacts the department. At the request of such person, the hearing officer or the department and upon a showing of good cause, the commissioner may grant one or more continuances.(2) A hearing based on a report submitted under subsection (c) of this section shall be limited to a determination of the following issues: (A) Did the police officer have probable cause to arrest the person for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both; (B) was such person placed under arrest; (C) did such person (i) refuse to submit to such test or nontestimonial portion of a drug influence evaluation, or (ii) submit to such test, commenced within two hours of the time of operation, and the results of such test indicated that such person had an elevated blood alcohol content; and (D) was such person operating the motor vehicle.(3) A hearing based on a report submitted under subsection (d) of this section shall be limited to a determination of the following issues: (A) Did the police officer have probable cause to arrest the person for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both; (B) was such person placed under arrest; (C) was such person operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both; and (D) was such person operating the motor vehicle.(4) In a hearing under this subsection, the results of the test, if administered, shall be sufficient to indicate the ratio of alcohol in the blood of such person at the time of operation, provided such test was commenced within two hours of the time of operation. The fees of any witness summoned to appear at a hearing under this subsection shall be the same as provided by the general statutes for witnesses in criminal cases. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of section 52-143, any subpoena summoning a police officer as a witness shall be served not less than seventy-two hours prior to the designated time of the hearing.(5) In a hearing based on a report submitted under subsection (d) of this section, evidence of operation under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both shall be admissible. Such evidence may include, but need not be limited to, (A) the police officer's observations of intoxication, as documented in a report submitted to the commissioner under subsection (d) of this section; (B) the results of any chemical test administered under this section or a toxicology report certified by the Division of Scientific Services within the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection; (C) hospital or medical records obtained in accordance with subsection (j) of this section or by the consent of the operator; (D) the results of any tests conducted by, or the report of, an officer trained in advanced roadside impaired driving enforcement; or (E) reports of drug recognition experts.(h) If, after a hearing under subdivision (2) of subsection (g) of this section, the commissioner finds in the negative on any one of the issues specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C) or (D) of said subdivision, the commissioner shall reinstate such license or operating privilege. If, after a hearing under subdivision (3) of subsection (g) of this section, the commissioner finds in the negative on any one of the issues specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C) or (D) of said subdivision, the commissioner shall reinstate such license or operating privilege. If, after such hearing under subdivision (2) or (3) of subsection (g) of this section, the commissioner does not find on any one of said issues in the negative or if such person fails to appear at such hearing, the commissioner shall affirm the suspension contained in the suspension notice for the appropriate period specified in subsection (i) of this section. The commissioner shall render a decision at the conclusion of such hearing and send a notice of the decision by bulk certified mail or by personal delivery, as defined in section 4-166, to such person. The notice of such decision sent by bulk certified mail or by personal delivery to the address of such person as shown by the records of the commissioner shall be sufficient notice to such person that such person's operator's license or operating privilege is reinstated or suspended, as the case may be. A notice of the decision shall only be transmitted by personal delivery if the operator has consented, in writing, to such personal delivery.(i)(1) The commissioner shall suspend the operator's license or operating privilege of a person who did not contact the department to schedule a hearing, who failed to appear at a hearing, or against whom a decision was issued, after a hearing, pursuant to subsection (h) of this section, as of the effective date contained in the suspension notice, for a period of forty-five days. As a condition for the restoration of such operator's license or operating privilege, such person shall be required to install an ignition interlock device on each motor vehicle owned or operated by such person and, upon such restoration, be prohibited from operating a motor vehicle unless such motor vehicle is equipped with a functioning, approved ignition interlock device, as defined in section 14-227j, for the longer of either (A) the period prescribed in subdivision (2) of this subsection for the present arrest and suspension, or (B) the period prescribed in subdivision (1), (2) or (3) of subsection (g) of section 14-227a or subdivision (1), (2) or (3) of subsection (c) of section 14-227m or subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (c) of section 14-227n for the present arrest and conviction, if any.(2)(A) A person twenty-one years of age or older at the time of the arrest who submitted to a test and the results of such test indicated that such person had an elevated blood alcohol content, or was found to have been operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both based on a report filed pursuant to subsection (d) of this section, shall install and maintain an ignition interlock device for the following periods: (i) For a first suspension under this section, six months; (ii) for a second suspension under this section, one year; and (iii) for a third or subsequent suspension under this section, two years; (B) a person under twenty-one years of age at the time of the arrest who submitted to a test and the results of such test indicated that such person had an elevated blood alcohol content, or was found to have been operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both based on a report filed pursuant to subsection (d) of this section, shall install and maintain an ignition interlock device for the following periods: (i) For a first suspension under this section, one year; (ii) for a second suspension under this section, two years; and (iii) for a third or subsequent suspension under this section, three years; and (C) a person, regardless of age, who refused to submit to a test or nontestimonial portion of a drug influence evaluation shall install and maintain an ignition interlock device for the following periods: (i) For a first suspension under this section, one year; (ii) for a second suspension under this section, two years; and (iii) for a third or subsequent suspension, under this section, three years.(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection, a person whose motor vehicle operator's license or operating privilege has been permanently revoked upon a third offense pursuant to subsection (g) of section 14-227a or subsection (c) of section 14-227m shall be subject to the penalties prescribed in subdivision (2) of subsection (i) of section 14-111.(j) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (b) to (i), inclusive, of this section, any police officer who obtains the results of a test of a blood sample taken from or a urine sample provided by an operator of a motor vehicle who was involved in an accident and suffered or allegedly suffered physical injury in such accident, or who was otherwise deemed by a police officer to require treatment or observation at a hospital, shall notify the commissioner and submit to the commissioner a written report if such results indicate that such person had an elevated blood alcohol content, or any quantity of an intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both, in such person's blood, and if such person was arrested for violation of section 14-227a or 14-227m or subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section 14-227n. The report shall be made on a form approved by the commissioner containing such information as the commissioner prescribes, and shall be subscribed and sworn to under penalty of false statement, as provided in section 53a-157b, by the police officer. The commissioner may, after notice and an opportunity for hearing, which shall be conducted by a hearing officer on behalf of the commissioner in accordance with chapter 54, suspend the motor vehicle operator's license or operating privilege of such person for the appropriate period of time specified in subsection (i) of this section and require such person to install and maintain an ignition interlock device for the appropriate period of time prescribed in subsection (i) of this section. Each hearing conducted under this subsection shall be limited to a determination of the following issues: (1) Whether the police officer had probable cause to arrest the person for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drug, or both; (2) whether such person was placed under arrest; (3) whether such person was operating the motor vehicle; (4) whether (A) the results of the analysis of the blood or urine of such person indicate that such person had an elevated blood alcohol content, or (B) the person was operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, or both; and (5) in the event that a blood sample was taken, whether the blood sample was obtained in accordance with conditions for admissibility and competence as evidence as set forth in subsection (k) of section 14-227a. If, after such hearing, the commissioner finds on any one of the said issues in the negative, the commissioner shall not impose a suspension. The fees of any witness summoned to appear at the hearing shall be the same as provided by the general statutes for witnesses in criminal cases, as provided in section 52-260.(k) The provisions of this section shall apply with the same effect to the refusal by any person to submit to an additional chemical test as provided in subparagraph (E) of subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of section 14-227a.(l) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any person whose physical condition is such that, according to competent medical advice, such test would be inadvisable.(m) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, when a person is required, pursuant to this section, to install and maintain an ignition interlock device or is prohibited, pursuant to this section, from operating a motor vehicle except under the condition that such device is installed and maintained on such vehicle, such requirement and condition shall cease to apply to such person upon any of the following conditions being met in the case of an arrest for a violation of section 14-227a, 14-227m or subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section 14-227n (1) for which the only intoxicating substance detected is cannabis: (A) All charges resulting from such alleged violation are withdrawn, nolled or dismissed; (B) the person has been acquitted of any charges resulting from such alleged violation; or (C) any conviction of such person based upon any charges resulting from such alleged violation is vacated, overturned or erased, or (2) for which the person was convicted for such violation, alcohol was detected as an intoxicating substance for such violation and such person has received an absolute pardon for each such conviction. Upon the ceasing of the application of such requirement and condition upon such person, the commissioner shall provide written notification to the person indicating that such requirement and condition has ceased to apply to such person. The provisions of this subsection shall not affect any other requirement or condition applied to such person.(n) The state shall pay the reasonable charges of any physician who, at the request of a law enforcement unit, as defined in section 7-294a, takes a blood sample for purposes of a test under the provisions of this section.(o) For the purposes of this section, "elevated blood alcohol content" means (1) a ratio of alcohol in the blood of such person that is eight-hundredths of one per cent or more of alcohol, by weight, (2) if such person is operating a commercial motor vehicle, a ratio of alcohol in the blood of such person that is four-hundredths of one per cent or more of alcohol, by weight, or (3) if such person is less than twenty-one years of age, a ratio of alcohol in the blood of such person that is two-hundredths of one per cent or more of alcohol, by weight. (p) The Commissioner of Motor Vehicles shall adopt regulations, in accordance with chapter 54, to implement the provisions of this section.Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-227b
(1963, P.A. 616, S. 2; February, 1965, P.A. 190; 1967, P.A. 656, S. 9; 721; P.A. 75-205; P.A. 80-438, S. 4; P.A. 81-446, S. 3; P.A. 82-403, S. 4; 82-408, S. 4; P.A. 83-534, S. 2; P.A. 85-596, S. 2; P.A. 89-314, S. 1, 5; P.A. 90-263, S. 73, 74; P.A. 93-371 , S. 1 , 5 ; P.A. 94-189 , S. 14 ; P.A. 95-279 , S. 1 , 2 ; P.A. 98-182 , S. 20 , 22 ; P.A. 99-255 , S. 2 ; P.A. 02-70 , S. 72 ; May 9 Sp. Sess. P.A. 02-1 , S. 109 ; P.A. 03-278 , S. 48 , 49 ; P.A. 04-250 , S. 1 ; P.A. 05-215 , S. 6 ; Jan. Sp. Sess. P.A. 08-1, S. 34; P.A. 08-32 , S. 1 ; P.A. 09-187 , S. 63 ; P.A. 10-110 , S. 27 ; P.A. 12-81 , S. 19 ; P.A. 14-228 , S. 6 ; P.A. 16-55 , S. 6 , 7 ; 16-126 , S. 17 .)
Amended by P.A. 24-0137,S. 2 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2024 Regular Session, eff. 10/1/2024.Amended by P.A. 24-0040,S. 54 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2024 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2024.Amended by P.A. 22-0044, S. 10 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2022 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2022.Amended by P.A. 22-0044, S. 8 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2022 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2022.Amended by P.A. 22-0040, S. 14 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2022 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2022.Amended by P.A. 21-0001, S. 118 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2021 Special Session, eff. 4/1/2022.Amended by P.A. 21-0106, S. 26 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2021 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2021.Amended by P.A. 16-0126, S. 17 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2016 Regular Session, eff. 10/1/2016.Amended by P.A. 16-0055, S. 7 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2016 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2016.Amended by P.A. 16-0055, S. 6 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2016 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2016.Amended by P.A. 14-0228, S. 6 of the Connecticut Acts of the 2014 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2015.Amended by P.A. 12-0081, S. 19 of the the 2012 Regular Session, eff. 7/1/2012.Amended by P.A. 10-0110, S. 27 of the February 2010 Regular Session, eff. 6/7/2010.Amended by P.A. 09-0187, S. 63 of the the 2009 Regular Session, eff. 10/1/2009. Cited. 200 C. 615 ; 203 Conn. 97 ; 210 Conn. 446 ; 224 C. 730 ; 229 C. 51; 230 C. 183 ; 235 Conn. 614 . Question of whether police have a reasonable and articulable suspicion to justify investigative stop is outside scope of the 4 issues to be considered at a license suspension hearing conducted pursuant to statute. 252 C. 38 . Defendant's being found intoxicated and asleep with key inserted in the ignition in the on position is sufficient evidence of operation of a motor vehicle. 281 C. 604 . Suspension of driver's license is not a criminal conviction, therefore continued criminal prosecution under Sec. 14-227a did not violate defendant's federal and state constitutional rights against double jeopardy; neither definition of "conviction" under Sec. 14-1 nor administrative suspension under section forecloses future proceedings against defendant for the same offense. 290 C. 634 . Cited. 9 Conn.App. 686 ; 12 CA 427 ; 14 CA 212 ; 15 Conn.App. 58 ; 22 Conn.App. 142 ; 26 Conn.App. 101 ; Id., 805; 27 Conn.App. 346 ; 28 CA 733 ; Id., 911; 29 CA 576 ; Id., 582; 30 Conn.App. 36 ; Id., 108; 31 CA 350 ; Id., 797; 33 CA 501 ; 34 Conn.App. 189 ; Id., 201; Id., 557; Id., 655; 36 Conn.App. 710 ; 43 CA 636 ; 44 CA 702 ; 45 Conn.App. 225 ; Id., 577. Finding that plaintiff refused to submit to breath analysis valid where plaintiff had provided sufficient breath for previous test and was warned his failure to blow would constitute a refusal. 47 CA 509 . Without legislative action to enlarge the scope of a license suspension hearing beyond the 4 issues specified in Subsec. (f), noncompliance with Subsec. (b) is irrelevant in such a proceeding. Id., 839. Court rejected defendant's claim that statute is void for vagueness because an ordinary person has no ascertainable method for measuring his or her own blood alcohol level. 48 Conn.App. 635 . Where arrested person refuses to take breath test, statute requires presence of 3 persons: the arresting officer, person charged and a third party witness who may or may not be the same person who took the arresting officer's oath. 54 CA 62 . Analysis provided for under section assumes a test for which results are obtained. 60 CA 455 . Plaintiff was not operating motor vehicle within section's meaning because, at the time the officer approached, plaintiff was not doing any act, manipulating any machinery or making use of any mechanical or electrical agency that alone or in sequence would set in motion the vehicle's motive power. 92 CA 365 . Determination that plaintiff refused to submit to a chemical alcohol test was supported by evidence that within 2 hours of operation of the motor vehicle, police officer asked plaintiff 3 times whether he would submit to testing and plaintiff did not consent but, rather, conditioned his decision to submit, and section does not permit an operator to rescind a refusal to submit to a chemical analysis of his or her blood, breath or urine. 156 CA 516 . The extent of the errors and discrepancies in A-44 form far surpassed mere scrivener's errors and undermined the exhibit's reliability as a whole such that admitting such form as an exhibit in hearing under section was an abuse of discretion. 164 CA 616 . Prior to statute, refusal of accused, while in custody, to submit samples of body fluids, unaccompanied by words or acts in the nature of admissions by conduct, was held inadmissible. 22 CS 321 . Where sample of blood was taken from defendant when he was unconscious in a hospital and could not give his consent, such taking was in violation of his constitutional rights and was not authorized by section. 26 CS 41 . Cited. 37 Conn.Supp. 767 ; 38 Conn.Supp. 675 ; Id., 689; 39 Conn.Supp. 285 . At time of arrest, statute did not afford a statutory right to consult with counsel. 40 CS 512 . Cited. 41 CS 437 ; 42 CS 1 ; Id., 306; Id., 599; Id., 602. In hearing on motor vehicle license suspension, failure of police to indicate on form use of certified analytical device not required by statute. 45 CS 489. Cited. 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 46; Id., 347. Competent evidence of any nature, in addition to a breath or blood test, may be relied on to prove insobriety. Id., 478, 479. Finding of operation must be made by the trier of the facts; state not empowered to request finding of operation after jury has been discharged and verdict has been accepted; circuit court's finding that defendant was operator of motor vehicle is a final judgment for purposes of Sec. 51-265 . 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 34, 46. Applies only to cases involved with driving under the influence of alcohol and not drugs; any test for drugs has no need for compliance with the relationship of time and arrest. 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 303. Subsec. (b): Cited. 12 Conn.App. 338 ; 17 CA 250 ; 28 Conn.App. 708 ; 41 Conn.App. 7 . Driver did not have fifth amendment right to consult with counsel before deciding whether to take breath test and failure of statute to require police officer to inform driver that his Miranda rights did not extend to taking a breath test did not deprive him of due process under fourteenth amendment. 53 CA 391 . Failure to warn completely as required by statute renders suspension of license contrary to law. 40 Conn.Supp. 505 . Reference to actual suspension period not required in warning to be given to operator. Id., 512. Subsec. (c): Written report required by section may be admissible at administrative suspension hearing even if officer originating report was not currently certified to administer breath analysis tests. 229 Conn. 31 . Report of refusal to take breath test properly admitted into evidence in administrative proceeding where plaintiff, arresting officer and testing officer were present during testing and arresting officer swore to report form in capacity as arresting officer and as witness to the refusal; court properly determined there was substantial evidence to support commissioner's finding of refusal by conduct where plaintiff failed to comply with officer's repeated instructions as to how test should be performed, improperly blew into Intoxilyzer and subsequently refused to blow into Intoxilyzer again. 61 CA 213 . Refusal to take breath test can occur through conduct as well as expressed refusal. 70 CA 76 . Watching refusal to submit to test via closed circuit television does not constitute "witnessing such refusal". 101 CA 674 . Subsec. (d): Before suspending a license, commissioner is not required to find that subject understood consequences of refusal to submit to chemical testing. 200 C. 1. License suspension hearing must be limited to the 4 issues set forth. 204 Conn. 507 . Scope of administrative hearing clearly limited. Id., 521. Subsec. (f): Legislature created a "rebuttable presumption" that test results can be used in place of direct evidence. 48 Conn.App. 391 . Re probable cause for traffic stop, an investigatory stop is authorized if the police officer had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime. 49 CA 481 . Subsec. (g): Probable cause not needed to make a lawful stop of a motor vehicle; investigative stops discussed. 47 CA 111 . Trial court's findings relative to administrative hearing issues reviewed and affirmed. Id., 451. A hearing officer, after concluding that chemical alcohol tests are unreliable, may not reach an independent determination on basis of other evidence presented as to whether a person operated a motor vehicle with an elevated blood alcohol level, since such a determination is outside the narrow scope of the license suspension hearing. 117 CA 832 . The alleged right to speak with an attorney before submitting to chemical testing of breath is not relevant to the 4 issues enumerated in Subsec. that are to be considered by the hearing officer in a license suspension hearing. 142 CA 361 . Subsec. (h): Administrative suspension of driver's license by Department of Motor Vehicles and prosecution by the court of underlying offense of driving while intoxicated does not violate separation of powers provision of state constitution. 51 Conn.App. 4 . Delivery by bulk certified mail of commissioner's decisions is sufficient notice. 62 CA 796 . Subsec. (j): Re plaintiff's claim that hearing officer should only have considered plaintiff's medical report re inadvisability to take Breathalyzer test, hearing officer's consideration of other evidence was proper in this case. 62 CA 604 . Subsec. (o): Appellate Court's implicit determination in 99 Conn.App. 563 that the Intoxilyzer's method of measuring blood alcohol content-extrapolating weight-by-weight measurement from weight-by-volume measurement-complies with the "by weight" directive in Sec. 14-227a(a) , also applies to the same directive in this Subsec. 51 CS 452.