Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-84
(1971, P.A. 822, S. 1; P.A. 75-605, S. 20, 27; P.A. 76-302, S. 1, 3; P.A. 77-600, S. 6, 15; 77-604, S. 68, 84; 77-605, S. 13, 21; 77-614, S. 165, 610; P.A. 78-303, S. 37, 136; P.A. 79-404, S. 1, 45; 79-493, S. 5, 7, 9; P.A. 80-482, S. 1, 4, 170, 191, 345, 348; 80-483, S. 2, 186; P.A. 82-423, S. 6, 8; P.A. 83-249, S. 7, 14; 83-586, S. 4, 14; P.A. 87-9, S. 2, 3; 87-234; 87-524, S. 6, 7; P.A. 88-225, S. 3, 14; P.A. 89-369, S. 3; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 91-1 , S. 2 , 6 , 22 ; P.A. 92-149 , S. 1 , 12 ; P.A. 94-69 , S. 2 , 3 ; P.A. 95-188 , S. 1 ; 95-195 , S. 4 , 83 ; 95-257 , S. 39 , 58 ; P.A. 96-11 , S. 1 , 5 ; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-6 , S. 2 -5, 14; P.A. 99-51 , S. 1 , 9 ; 99-145 , S. 14 , 23 ; P.A. 00-66 , S. 2 ; P.A. 02-130 , S. 13 ; P.A. 03-215 , S. 5 ; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 146 (d); P.A. 04-38 , S. 2 ; 04-169 , S. 17 ; 04-189 , S. 1 ; 04-245 , S. 5 , 6 ; P.A. 05-287 , S. 41 ; P.A. 06-137 , S. 32 ; 06-196 , S. 8 -10; P.A. 07-1 , S. 6 ; 07-166 , S. 11 , 12 ; Sept. Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-3 , S. 20 ; Sept. Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-7, S. 169; P.A. 11-51 , S. 184 ; 11-80 , S. 1 ; P.A. 12-129 , S. 2 ; 12-206 , S. 1 ; P.A. 13-244 , S. 9 -11; 13-299 , S. 48 ; P.A. 16-127 , S. 24 ; P.A. 17-237 , S. 22 ; P.A. 18-91 , S. 79 ; P.A. 18-175 , S. 7 .)
Cited. 229 C. 479 . Ethics Commission has jurisdiction in case involving the use of office by state employee for financial gain even if employee's behavior could arguably subject him to discipline by Commissioner of Administrative Services pursuant to State Personnel Act. 53 CA 808 . A state employee may be found to have used his position to obtain financial gain in violation of Subsec. (c) when he uses state work time or facilities such as e-mail, computer websites or storage or telephones for financial gain while holding such position as a state employee, and such interpretation is entitled to judicial deference as a time-tested interpretation of the board. 140 CA 754 . Not unconstitutionally void for vagueness or overbroad as applied to plaintiff, a high sheriff engaged in fee splitting. 45 CS 242 . Stipulated agreement between union and Workers' Compensation Commission re use of state time for production of transcripts by commission hearing reporters does not govern over provisions of Subsec. (c), which the board properly found to prohibit reporters from preparing transcripts for private sale during state-compensated time. 52 CS 304 .
See Sec. 1-79a re calculation of dollar limit on gifts.