Section 30029.07 - Allocations out of Support Services Growth Subaccount and Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount(a)(1) The moneys allocated out of the Support Services Growth Subaccount and the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount of the Sales and Use Tax Growth Account shall be allocated to each of the following subaccounts in each county or city and county's County Local Revenue Fund 2011: (A) From the Protective Services Growth Special Account in the Support Services Growth Subaccount to the Protective Services Subaccount in the county Support Services Account.(B) From the Behavioral Health Services Growth Special Account in the Support Services Growth Subaccount to the Behavioral Health Subaccount in the county Support Services Account.(C) From the Trial Court Security Growth Special Account in the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount to the Trial Court Security Subaccount in the county Law Enforcement Services Account.(D) From the Community Corrections Growth Special Account in the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount to the Community Corrections Subaccount in the county Law Enforcement Services Account.(E) From the District Attorney and Public Defender Growth Special Account in the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount to the District Attorney and Public Defender Subaccount in the county Law Enforcement Services Account.(F) From the Juvenile Justice Growth Special Account in the Law Enforcement Services Growth Subaccount to the Juvenile Justice Subaccount in the county Law Enforcement Services Account.(2) The allocations shall be made pursuant to the percentages provided in this section or, if those percentage allocations are not provided herein, then the funds shall be allocated pursuant to schedules provided by the Department of Finance created in accordance with any criteria contained in this section and in consultation with appropriate state departments and the California State Association of Counties.(b) Beginning in the 2015-16 fiscal year, each county treasurer, city and county treasurer, or other appropriate official shall transfer to the Local Innovation Subaccount 10 percent of the moneys received during a fiscal year from each of the following state accounts:(1) The Trial Court Security Growth Special Account.(2) The Community Corrections Growth Special Account.(3) The District Attorney and Public Defender Growth Special Account.(4) The Juvenile Justice Growth Special Account.(c) The funds allocated to the Protective Services Growth Special Account, pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of, and subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of, Section 30027.9, shall be allocated in monthly installments by the Controller to the Protective Services Subaccount in the Support Services Account of the County Local Revenue Fund 2011 according to the same percentages as provided in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d).(d)(1)(A) Beginning in the 2012-13 fiscal year, of the funds allocated to the Protective Services Growth Special Account, pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of, subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of, and subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of, Section 30027.9, 10 percent shall be allocated pursuant to a schedule developed by the Department of Finance in consultation with the State Department of Social Services and the California State Association of Counties pursuant to subparagraph (C) only to those counties that have expended in that fiscal year an amount at least equivalent to that which the county would have had to spend in the absence of 2011 Realignment Legislation to access the augmentation funding pursuant to Section 10609.9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, as that section read prior to the enactment of 2011 Realignment Legislation, on services that were previously funded by the General Fund from the Child Welfare Services Allocation prior to the enactment of 2011 Realignment Legislation. The determination of whether a county expended the amount necessary to be eligible for the allocation pursuant to this subparagraph shall be made based on claims for that fiscal year received by the State Department of Social Services as of August 1 of the subsequent fiscal year.(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), small counties, defined as those counties with a population of 50,000 or fewer pursuant to demographic information released each year by the Department of Finance, are exempt from the requirement of subparagraph (A) and shall be included in the schedule developed pursuant to subparagraph (A) as if they had met the expenditure requirement of subparagraph (A).(C) Moneys available pursuant to this subdivision shall be allocated on a proportional basis to each eligible county based on its share relative to other eligible counties as follows: Alameda County | 4.4015% |
Alpine County | 0.0631% |
Amador County | 0.0813% |
Butte County | 0.7740% |
Calaveras County | 0.1462% |
Colusa County | 0.0791% |
Contra Costa County | 2.5317% |
Del Norte County | 0.2126% |
El Dorado County | 0.4152% |
Fresno County | 2.2139% |
Glenn County | 0.1826% |
Humboldt County | 0.5591% |
Imperial County | 0.5981% |
Inyo County | 0.0985% |
Kern County | 2.6123% |
Kings County | 0.4206% |
Lake County | 0.1797% |
Lassen County | 0.1364% |
Los Angeles County | 32.2850% |
Madera County | 0.3778% |
Marin County | 0.3038% |
Mariposa County | 0.1088% |
Mendocino County | 0.5455% |
Merced County | 0.7330% |
Modoc County | 0.0690% |
Mono County | 0.0706% |
Monterey County | 0.7204% |
Napa County | 0.2848% |
Nevada County | 0.1494% |
Orange County | 5.3605% |
Placer County | 0.9329% |
Plumas County | 0.1091% |
Riverside County | 5.9106% |
Sacramento County | 4.9631% |
San Benito County | 0.1372% |
San Bernardino County | 4.4486% |
San Diego County | 7.8876% |
San Francisco County | 1.9870% |
San Joaquin County | 1.7214% |
San Luis Obispo County | 0.8698% |
San Mateo County | 1.1945% |
Santa Barbara County | 0.6875% |
Santa Clara County | 4.4380% |
Santa Cruz County | 0.4888% |
Shasta County | 0.4969% |
Sierra County | 0.0616% |
Siskiyou County | 0.1603% |
Solano County | 0.6608% |
Sonoma County | 0.9682% |
Stanislaus County | 1.2472% |
Sutter County | 0.2955% |
Tehama County | 0.2861% |
Trinity County | 0.1588% |
Tulare County | 1.2609% |
Tuolumne County | 0.1505% |
Ventura County | 1.0447% |
Yolo County | 0.3336% |
Yuba County | 0.3843% |
(2)(A) For the 2012-13 fiscal year, the remaining 90 percent of the funds allocated to the Protective Services Growth Special Account from the Support Services Growth Subaccount pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 30027.9 shall be allocated by the Controller to all counties in the same proportions as set forth for the 2012-13 fiscal year pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 30029.5.(B) For the 2013-14 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, the remaining 90 percent of the funds allocated to the Protective Services Growth Special Account from the Support Services Growth Subaccount pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) or subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 30027.9 shall be allocated to all counties in the same proportions as the base funding is allocated for that fiscal year pursuant to Section 30029.5.(3) After consultation with the State Department of Social Services and the California State Association of Counties, the Department of Finance shall provide a schedule developed as specified in this section for allocation of growth funds annually to the Controller.(e)(1) For the 2012-13 and 2013-14 fiscal years, the Community Corrections Growth Special Account shall be allocated by the Controller pursuant to a schedule provided by the Department of Finance. The schedule shall reflect priorities that promote the effective implementation of the 2011 Public Safety Realignment, as follows: (A) A guaranteed minimum allocation for each county.(B) The establishment of appropriate small county minimum allocations.(C) Adjustments for county average daily population (ADP) variations from projected ADP impact.(D) Other factors affecting the implementation of the 2011 Public Safety Realignment program, as determined by the Department of Finance.(E) Implementation of the 2011 Public Safety Realignment in a manner consistent with the legislative intent described in Sections 17.5 and 3450 of the Penal Code.(2) When developing the schedule, the Department of Finance shall consider a county's commitment to continuing, expanding, or initiating community corrections practices, programs and strategies that manage felony offender populations most cost effectively through the use of evidence-based practices designed to achieve improved public safety, including, but not limited to, the use of offender risk and needs assessment tools, criminogenic-based interventions, substance abuse and mental health treatment, and additional treatment and sanctions other than traditional jail incarceration alone or routine probation supervision, as well as community-based programs.Added by Stats 2012 ch 40 (SB 1020),s 18, eff. 6/27/2012.