Vt. Mand. CLE R. 8
Board's Notes
This rule is drawn from the prior rules § 9(d)-(i), and (k), although the suspension and hearing processes have been revised substantially to fully lay out attorneys' rights and obligations and to make these processes consistent with the reporting process of Rule 7(B) and with A.O. 41 and the Rules of Admission.
In the prior rule § 9, when faced with an attorney who does not challenge the Board's statement of noncompliance, the Board could not suspend the attorney but could only make a recommendation of suspension to the Supreme Court. In contrast, the new rule parallels the suspension process in A.O. 41 and the Rules of Admission, in which the authority to make the initial suspension decision is given to the licensing authorities, in this case, the Board. Like A.O. 41, the new rule makes it clear that any suspension under these rules is a nondisciplinary, administrative suspension.
The new rule follows the prior rule in allowing an attorney who contests noncompliance to have an evidentiary hearing. The hearing process in the new rule is based on the hearing process for character and fitness hearings laid out in the Rules of Admission and provides that the ultimate arbiter in cases where an attorney contests noncompliance is the Supreme Court.
The Board notes that any action it may take in response to a violation of this Rule does not deprive either Disciplinary Counsel or the Professional Responsibility Board of pursuing such disciplinary action as may also be warranted.