The party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response within 30 days after the service of the request, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter or longer time. The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, including an objection to the requested form or forms for producing electronically stored information, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part shall be specified. If objection is made to the requested form or forms for producing electronically stored information (or if no form was specified in the request) the responding party must state the form or forms it intends to use. The party submitting the request may move for an order under Rule 37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to respond to the request or any part thereof, or any failure to permit inspection as requested. A party who produces documents for inspection shall produce them as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond with the categories in the request.
Unless the parties otherwise agree, or the court otherwise orders:
S.C. R. Civ. P. 34
This is the language of the current Federal Rule, and is an amended version of the rule which served as a guide for present Circuit Court Rule 88. The major change is that the requirement of good cause is eliminated because it was an erratic and uncertain guide for decisions by the court. It also saves the court having to handle the matter unless there is an objection to the document requests. Thirty days are permitted for a response, and there is provision for an independent action for discovery against persons not parties to the action.
Note to 1993 Amendment:
Rule 34 applies only to production from parties, and was amended specifically to provide that production from non-parties is governed only by Rule 45.
Note to 2011 Amendment:
The amendments to Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37 and 45 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure concerning electronic discovery are substantially similar to the corresponding provisions in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The rules concerning electronic discovery are intended to provide a practical, efficient and cost-effective method to assure reasonable discovery. Pursuit of electronic discovery must relate to the claims and defenses asserted in the pleadings and should serve as a means for facilitating a just and cost-effective resolution of disputes.