R.I. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 7
2002 Committee Notes
Subdivision (b) has not changed, but the Committee notes that audio/video communications will need to include fax capability in order to allow for signing of waivers of indictment or information.
Subdivision (e) is amended to correct a grammatical error. No change in substance is intended.
In subdivision (f), the time within which a defendant must file a motion for a bill of particulars is enlarged from ten (10) days to thirty (30) days after arraignment to allow additional time for defense counsel to prepare the motion. Since the rule has always allowed the court to permit the motion for a bill of particulars to be filed at a later time, the change is not dramatic. The portion of the rule that allowed the motion to be filed before arraignment has been deleted as impractical and inconsistent with Rhode Island practice.
1975 Notes
The adoption by the General Assembly of the information charging system under chapter 12-12 of the General Laws makes it necessary to make conforming changes in the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. In most instances the revisions are essentially minor and merely add the term "information" to rules, titles and the table of rules which presently refer only to indictments and complaints. Those amendments are [to Rules 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 29, 34, 41, 46, and 48.] The other amendments which are of somewhat more significance, are [new Rules 6.1 and 9.1, amendments to Rules 10, 12, 41, and 54, and new Form 6A.]
1972 Notes
Rule 7 differs in a number of respects from its federal counterpart. A major difference is the use under the federal rules of the information as the charging document in cases for which indictments either are not required or are waived. Under traditional Rhode Island practice the complaint, rather than the information, has been used for this purpose; it has been retained under the rules and where appropriate performs the same function as the information. Also, the requirement under the Rhode Island rule of an indictment where the offense charged can be punished by more than a year imprisonment or by a fine exceeding $500 differs from the federal rule by omitting reference to punishment at hard labor. As drafted, and the rule satisfies Article I, § 7 of the Rhode Island Constitution which requires that prosecution of an "infamous crime" is to proceed by indictment or presentment of a grand jury. The term "infamous crime" as used in this context appears to include any offense which can be punished by more than a year imprisonment or by loss of civil rights. State v. Rezendes, 105 R.I. 483, 253 A.2d 233, 236 (1969); State v. Nichols, 27 R.I. 69, 82-84, 60 A. 763, 768-69(1905). Under the General Laws only persons who are sentenced to imprisonment for more than one year suffer civil disabilities. G.L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment), § 13-6-2. In addition, felonies are defined by statute to include any offense punishable by more than one year imprisonment or by a fine of more than $500. G.L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment), § 11-1-2. The requirement under the rule that offenses which are punishable as felonies be proceeded against by indictment satisfies the constitutional requisite and requires uniform treatment of all crimes within the original jurisdiction of the Superior Court.
Subdivision (b) is basically the same as existing Rhode Island law (G.L.1956 (1969 Reenactment), § 12-12-19 ); it differs from its federal counterpart by precluding waiver in cases where either a mandatory term of life imprisonment or death can be imposed and by permitting waiver in all other cases only with leave of the Superior Court. Also, it specifically requires that waiver of indictment be in writing.
Subdivision (c) differs from the federal rule by not requiring the indictment or complaint to contain "the essential facts constituting the offense" and by further authorizing indictments and complaints to charge offenses either by using the common law name for the offense or by stating the common law or statutory definition of the offense. This modification conforms to existing Rhode Island practice which permits somewhat shorter and more simplified indictments and complaints (G.L.1958 (1969 Reenactment), § 12-12-6 ), while preserving a defendant's right "to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation." R.I. Const. Art. I, § 10. See State v. Domanski, 57 R.I. 500, 190 A. 854 (1937).
With minor modification the balance of subdivision (c) is essentially the same as the federal rule; it comports generally with existing Rhode Island practice except for the provision which expressly authorizes incorporation by reference, a procedure not presently used in Rhode Island.
Subdivisions (d) and (e) are essentially the same as their federal counterpart and accord generally with existing Rhode Island practice. See G.L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment), § 12-12-4. See Picillo v. Sharkey, 107 R.I. 147, 265 A.2d 644, 646 (1970).
Subdivision (f) departs from the federal rule by making it mandatory that a defendant be provided with a bill of particulars upon demand and without the need to show cause. This comports with G.L.1956 (1969 Reenactment), § 12-12-9 (Supp.1970).