Explanatory Note: The Court will presently defer cases if they are "Uninsured or Underinsured Motorist Savings Actions," or Underinsured Motorist Benefits (Act 6). See English v. Pa.F.R.A.C.P., et al, 427 Pa. Super. 105, 628 A.2d 847 (1993), allocatur granted, 645 A.2d 1316 (1994). Additional categories may be added by the Court from time to time.
Seewww.courts.phila.gov/forms for the current version of the Compulsory Arbitration Motion Practice Miscellaneous Application.
Explanatory Note: Cases may be deferred due to, inter alia, bankruptcy, imprisonment, or military status of any party.
Explanatory Note: Before filing the Miscellaneous Arbitration Application with the Arbitration Center, a copy of the Application must be mailed/delivered/faxed to opposing counsel and unrepresented parties who may submit a Response to the Applicant prior to the date the Application may be filed. See Miscellaneous Arbitration Application and Response Forms and Instructions.
See www.courts.phila.gov/forms for the current version of the Praecipe, Uninsured/Underinsured Savings Action
See www.courts.phila.gov/forms for the current version of the Continuance & Deferral Application.
Explanatory Note: Counsel are cautioned not to call or write the Arbitration Center for status of the Application, or to request "reconsideration" in the event the Continuance Application is denied.
Seewww.courts.phila.gov/forms for the current version of the One-Time Only Rescheduling Agreementapplication form.
Explanatory Note: Although the Court disfavors the grant of continuances, a conflict with a scheduled Arbitration Hearing date may be resolved by agreeing to an earlier Arbitration Hearing.
Explanatory Note: Pa.R.C.P. 1021(d) provides that "The Court on its own motion or motion of any party may by discovery, pre-trial conference, hearing or otherwise, determine the amount actually in controversy and enter an order of reference to arbitration." The within local rule does not limit the Court from transferring appropriate cases to compulsory Arbitration.
Robert Half International Inc. v. Marlton Technologies, Inc., 2006 Pa. Super 145; 902 A.2d 519 (2006), requires that upon the filing of a counterclaim seeking monetary damages in excess of the arbitration limits, the case be transferred from the Compulsory Arbitration Program. The transfer will be made automatically upon the filing of a counterclaim which seeks monetary damages in excess of the arbitration limits.
It is suggested that the counterclaimant make the Office of Judicial Records aware that the case previously assigned to the Arbitration Program must be transferred to another Program due to the amount of the monetary damages sought in the counterclaim. Upon implementation of electronic filing, the Electronic Filing System will contain the necessary functionality to effectuate the transfer.
Phil. Cnty. Pa. *1303