Rule 6.15 - Applicant Must be Recommended by a Majority of the Board(1) Subject to review by the Court under Rule 9.60, an applicant may not be admitted to practice law in Oregon unless at least a majority of all non-recused members of the Board considers the applicant to be qualified by age and by the requisite moral character, fitness, learning and ability.(2) The Board may recommend that an applicant be(a) Denied admission for failure to comply with Rule 6.05(4);(b) Denied admission after an evidentiary hearing, as provided in Rule 9.55(4);(c) Admitted conditionally, subject to probationary terms as specified by the Board; or(d) Admitted unconditionally.(3) The Board may recommend specific probationary terms for admission, including, but not limited to, requiring alcohol or drug treatment, requiring medical care, requiring psychological or psychiatric care, requiring professional office practice or management counseling, requiring practice supervision, and requiring professional audits or reports. The Board may recommend persons to supervise the probation and may recommend that cooperation with such supervisors be a probationary term. The Board may recommend that violation of any probationary term be grounds for revocation of probation and immediate suspension from the practice of law. The Board may recommend a specific duration for such probationary terms.Or. State. Bar. R. Regul. and Polic. 6.15