Or. State. Bar. R. Regul. and Polic. 2.3
Defined Terms (see Rule 1.0):
"Believes"
"Informed consent"
"Knows"
"Matter"
"Reasonably believes"
"Reasonably should know"
Comparison to Oregon Code
This rule is similar to DR 7-101(D), which was adopted in 1997 based on former ABA Model Rule 2.3. Paragraph (b) is new in 2002 to require client consent only when the evaluation poses is a risk of material and adverse affect on the client. Under paragraph (a), when there is no such risk, the lawyer needs only to determine that the evaluation is compatible with other aspects of the relationship.