Or. State. Bar. R. Regul. and Polic. 1.11
Defined Terms (see Rule 1.0):
"Confirmed in writing"
"Informed consent"
"Firm"
"Knowingly"
"Knows"
"Matter"
"Screened"
"Substantial"
"Tribunal"
"Written"
Comparison to Oregon Code
This rule has no exact counterpart in the Oregon Code, under which the responsibilities of government lawyers are addressed in DR 5-109 and DR 8-101, as well as in the general conflict limitations of DR 5-105. This rule puts all the requirements for government lawyers in one place.
Paragraph (a) is essentially the same as DR 5-109(B).
Paragraph (b) imputes a former government lawyer's unconsented-to conflicts to the new firm unless the former government lawyer is screened from participation in the matter, as would be allowed under DR 5-105(I).
Paragraph (c) incorporates the prohibitions in DR 8-101(A)(1), (A)(4) and (B). It also allows screening of the disqualified lawyer to avoid disqualification of the entire firm.
Paragraph (d) applies concurrent and former client conflicts to lawyers currently serving as a public officer or employee; it also incorporates in (d)(2) (i) -(iv) the limitations in DR 8-101(A)(1)-(4), with the addition in (d)(2)(iv) of language from MR 1.11 that a lawyer is prohibited from using only that government information that the lawyer knows is confidential. Paragraph (d)(2)(v) is the converse of DR 5-109(B), and has no counterpart in the Oregon Code other than the general former client conflict provision of DR 5-105. Paragraph (d)(2)(vi) has no counterpart in the Oregon Code; it is an absolute bar to negotiating for private employment while a serving in a non-judicial government position for anyone other than a law clerk or staff lawyer assisting in the official duties of a judicial officer.
Paragraph (e) is taken from DR 8-101(C) to retain a relatively recent addition to the Oregon Code.
Paragraph (f) is taken from DR 8-101(D), also to retain a relatively recent addition to the Oregon Code.