Or. R. App. P. 7.55

As amended through June 11, 2024
Rule 7.55 - COURT OF APPEALS APPELLATE COMMISSIONER
(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this rule, the appellate commissioner for the Court of Appeals is delegated concurrent authority to decide motions and own motion matters that otherwise may be decided by the Chief Judge under ORS 2.570(6). The appellate commissioner is delegated concurrent authority to decide any other matter that the Court of Appeals or Chief Judge lawfully may delegate for decision.
(2) The appellate commissioner does not have authority to decide a motion that would result in the disposition of a case on its merits, except as to:
(a) A joint or stipulated motion for a disposition on the merits, where the relief granted is consistent with the relief sought in the motion.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph(c) of this subsection, a motion to reverse and remand for new trial under ORS 19.420(3) due to loss or destruction of the trial court record.
(c) A motion for summary affirmance to the same extent that the Chief Judge could decide the motion under ORS 30.647(3), ORS 34.712, ORS 138.225, ORS 138.660, ORS 144.335(6), or any other statute authorizing summary affirmance.
(3) The appellate commissioner shall have the authority to refer any matter to the Chief Judge or the Motions Department, as appropriate.
(4)
(a) A party may seek reconsideration of a decision of the appellate commissioner as provided by ORAP 6.25, with the exceptions that
(i) the provision of ORAP 6.25(1)(e) disfavoring claims addressing legal issues already argued by the parties or addressed by the court shall not apply to petitions or motions for reconsideration of a decision of the appellate commissioner, and
(ii) only the original of the petition must be filed.
(b) If a party files a petition or motion for reconsideration of a ruling by the appellate commissioner, the appellate commissioner may consider the matter in the first instance. The appellate commissioner shall have the authority to grant a request for reconsideration and modify or reverse the result. However, if the appellate commissioner would deny the request or grant the request and affirm the result, the commissioner shall forward the request to the Chief Judge or the Motions Department, as appropriate, for decision.
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this subsection, a decision of the appellate commissioner is not subject to a petition for review in the Supreme Court, but the decision of the Chief Judge or the Motions Department on reconsideration of a ruling of the appellate commissioner is subject to a petition for review. ORAP 6.25(3) is not applicable to a ruling of the appellate commissioner.
(d) When the appellate commissioner makes a determination of appealability under ORS 19.235(3) and designates it as a "summary determination" as provided in ORAP 2.35(3)(a), the appellate commissioner's order is subject to a petition for review in the Supreme Court.
(5) As used in this rule, "own motion matter" includes but is not limited to an order to show cause why a case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or for lack of prosecution, an order of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction or lack of prosecution where the court has raised the ground for dismissal on its own motion, and an order for substitution of a public officer who is a party to the case where a new person has duly assumed the public office.
(6) As used in these rules, "Motions Department" means the Court of Appeals Motions Department.

Or. R. App. P. 7.55

Amended November 15, 2018, effective 1/1/2019; amended November 13, 2020, effective 1/1/2021.