Ohio. R. Superi. Ct. 69
Commentary (October 1, 1997)
This rule is not analogous to former C.P. Sup. R. 37, which has been incorporated in Sup. R. 68.
Sup. R. 69 is basically a new rule as it applies to all claims of incompetent adult wards. The purpose for the amended rule is to provide the court with information necessary to make an informed decision regarding a proposed settlement.
Division (A) provides for the application to settle a claim to be brought by the ward's guardian. Absent a guardianship, the "ward" is competent to settle the claim without court approval. Division (A) further gives the court discretion to require notice to interested parties or to dispense with notice with court approval.
Division (B) is similar to Sup. R. 68(B), which provides the court with adequate information to make an informed decision. Division (C) is similar to the last sentence of Sup. R. 68(B) and requires disclosure to the court and approval of the court of counsel fees in pursuing the adult ward's claim.