Ohio. R. Superi. Ct. 64
Commentary (October 1, 1997)
This rule revises former C.P. Sup. R. 32.
Former C.P. Sup. R. 32(A) and (B) have been deleted. This subject matter is more appropriately addressed in proposed Sup. R. 78, the case management rule.
Former C.P. Sup. R. 32(C) has been changed grammatically and relettered as division (A). The substance has remained the same in that it requires the vouchers to be cross referenced to the
account entries. Former divisions (A)(1) to (4) have been deleted in that they describe the parameters of the probate forms created under Sup. R. 52(D) and are therefore superfluous.
Former C.P. Sup. R. 32(D) has been relettered as division (B). The rule has been amended to require a closing statement to be submitted in lieu of the reporting requirements under the former rule.
Former C.P. Sup. R. 32(E) has been deleted to reflect local practice where each guardianship of a minor's estate is administered in a separate case file and a separate corresponding case number.
Former C.P. Sup. R. 32(F) has been relettered as division (C) and amended to require that when a power of attorney is used for the receipt of assets, the instrument must be recorded in the county of the court accepting the account. The previous rule required the instrument to be recorded in the State of Ohio.
Former C.P. Sup. R. 32(G) has been relettered as division (D). The term "safety deposit box" has been amended to "safe deposit box" to parallel Revised Code references. The term "financial institution" has been substituted for "bank" in order to be consistent with the terminology of Title XI of the Revised Code and to be more inclusive.
Former C.P. Sup. R. 32(H) has been relettered as division (E), and no amendments or language changes have been made.
Commentary (April 8, 2004)
This Rule Amendment is necessary because of the adoption of Sub. H.B. 85, effective October 31, 2001.