Ohio. Civ.R. 56
Proposed Staff Notes (2019 Amendment)
Division (C)
Recognizing that provisions of Civ.R. 6(C) govern the requirements for service of responses to motions for summary judgment and for service of a movant's reply to such responses, the amendment to Civ.R. 56(C) eliminates the prior provisions addressing those matters.
Division (C) is also amended to specify that the materials in support of a motion for summary judgment shall be served when the motion is served.
Staff Note (July 1, 2015 Amendment)
Consistent with a similar amendment to Civ. R. 6(C), the amendment to Civ. R. 56(C) deletes the reference in the prior rule to "the time fixed for hearing." The amendment also specifies, in the absence of a local rule or court order specifying a time for responding to a motion for summary judgment, a fallback time of twenty-eight days after service of the motion within which to serve responsive arguments and opposing affidavits. In the absence of a local rule or court order addressing replies, the amendment also permits the movant to serve reply arguments within fourteen days after service of the adverse party's response. The time for filing the motion, responses, and replies is governed by Civ. R. 5(D), again in the absence of a local rule or court order specifying a different time for filing. The rule applies only in the absence of a local rule or court order providing times for briefing motions, whether or not the rule or order specifically addresses summary judgment motions, and does not supersede or affect the application of local rules or orders addressing briefing on motions.
Staff Note (July 1, 1999 Amendment)
Rule 56(C) Motion and proceedings thereon
The prior rule provided that "transcripts of evidence in the pending case" was one of the items that could be considered in deciding a motion for summary judgment. The 1999 amendment deleted "in the pending case" so that transcripts of evidence from another case can be filed and considered in deciding the motion.
Staff Note (July 1, 1997 Amendment)
Rule 56(A) For party seeking affirmative relief.
The 1997 amendment to division (A) divided the previous first sentence into two separate sentences for clarity and ease of reading, and replaced a masculine reference with gender-neutral language. The amendment is grammatical only and no substantive change is intended.
Rule 56(B) For defending party.
The 1997 amendment to division (B) added a comma after the "may" in the first sentence and replaced a masculine reference with gender-neutral language. The amendment is grammatical only and no substantive change is intended.
Rule 56(C) Motion and proceedings thereon.
The 1997 amendment to division (C) changed the word "pleading" to "pleadings" and replaced a masculine reference with gender-neutral language. The amendment is grammatical only and no substantive change is intended.
Rule 56(E) Form of affidavits; further testimony; defense required.
The 1997 amendment to division (E) replaced several masculine references with gender-neutral language. The amendment is grammatical only and no substantive change is intended. Rule 56(F) When affidavits unavailable.
Rule 56(F) When affidavits unavailable.
The 1997 amendment to division (F) replaced several masculine references with gender-neutral language. The amendment is grammatical only and no substantive change is intended.
Rule 56(G) Affidavits made in bad faith.
The 1997 amendment to division (G) replaced a masculine reference with gender-neutral language. The amendment is grammatical only and no substantive change is intended.