Ohio. App. R. 25
Staff Note (July 1, 2010 amendment)
The amendment to division (A) is intended to ensure that the ten-day period for filing a motion to certify a conflict begins to run at the time the court of appeals first enters a judgment or order that creates an intra-district conflict. Subsequent motion practice under App. R. 26 does not extend that ten-day period if the conflict was already present in the court's original judgment. On the other hand, the ten days begin to run with the entry of a judgment or order ruling on an application for reconsideration or en banc consideration under App. R. 26(A) if the intra-district conflict first arises in the court's ruling on that application.
The amendment to division (B) ensures a responding party's full ten-day response period, even if that party does not receive the motion on the day it is filed. Because the ten-day response period now begins to run from the date of service, a party served by mail now has an extra three days to file an opposition. See App. R. 14(C). The amendment to division (B) also permits the moving party a reply in support of the motion within seven days of service of the opposition; this clarification avoids any ambiguity about the right to file a reply in support of a motion under App. R. 15(A).
Staff Note (July 1, 2011 amendment)
App. R. 25(A) has been amended in two ways. The first amendment changes the event that starts the running of the ten-day period for filing a motion to certify an inter-district conflict. Under the former rule, the motion was due within ten days of the entry of the judgment or order first creating the conflict; under the amended rule, the motion is due within ten days of the clerk's compliance with the mailing and docketing requirements of App. R. 30(A).
The second amendment is merely a clarification that any subsequent appeal, the time for which is not extended by a motion to certify a conflict, lies in the Ohio Supreme Court. No substantive change is intended by this clarification.