The 1985 legislative assembly provided for appointment of judicial referees under House Bill 1586. Under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 3, and N.D.C.C. § 27-05-30, the supreme court adopts the following administrative rule relating to judicial referees.
The North Dakota judicial system's policy is to provide for the qualifications, the extent and assignment of authority, procedure and the conduct of the role of judicial referees within the North Dakota judicial system in each judicial district.
Minimum qualifications for a judicial referee include:
The presiding judge, on behalf of all of the district court judges of the judicial district, must execute in writing the appointment of all judicial referees, to serve at the pleasure of the district court judges of the judicial district. Judicial referees must be compensated under the personnel system of the North Dakota Judicial System.
Each judicial referee will have jurisdiction only within the judicial district of appointment and is expected to maintain an office as assigned by the presiding judge of the judicial district. A judicial referee may be appointed to temporary duty in another judicial district by the presiding judge of the judicial district, with the consent of the presiding judge of the receiving judicial district or by the chief justice under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 3.
Except in small claims court cases under N.D.C.C. ch. 27-08.1 and in traffic cases under N.D.C.C. § 39-06.1-03, proceedings must be heard on the record.
Any party to a proceeding before a judicial referee is entitled to have the matter heard by a district court judge, if written request is filed by the party within seven days after service of either the initiating documents or other notice informing the party of this right.
The Rules of Judicial Conduct must be observed by each judicial referee.
N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. & Ord. 13
Joint Procedure Committee Meeting Minutes of September 26, 2013, pages 2-6; January 31-February 1, 2013, page 29; September 23-24, 2010, pages 14-15, 21; April 29-30, 2010, page 21; April 24-25, 2003, page 3; January 30-31, 2003, pages 21-23;April 25-26, 2002, pages 16-17; May 6-7, 1999, pages 14-15; April 29-30, 1993, page 2.Court Services Administration Committee Meeting Minutes of May 17, 1985, pages 2-4. Family Caselaw Referee Study Subcommittee of Court Services Administration Committee Meeting Minutes of April 19, 1985, pages 3-8; March 15, 1985, pages 1-6; February 22, 1985, pages 1-9;January 11, 1985, pages 2-8; and December 17, 1984, page 5. North Dakota Constitution, Article VI, Section 3; and Section 27-05-30 NDCC.
Adopted as emergency rule effective 6/13/1985; readopted9/17/1985; amended effective 3/1/1994; 1/1/1995; 3/1/2000; 3/1/2003; 3/1/2004; 3/1/2011;3/1/2012; 6/1/2012; 9/1/2013; 3/1/2014; 3/1/2015; 8/1/2017; 3/1/2018; 1/1/2019; amended effective 8/11/2021.
Section 5 was amended, effective 9/1/2013, to reflect enactment of 2013 House Bill No. 1075 [2013 N.D. Sess. Laws ch. 241, §1], which added three categories of cases to the statutory list of proceedings that may be delegated to a judicial referee by a presiding judge: disorderly conduct restraining order cases, noncriminal game and fish violations, and review of administrative license suspensions for nonpayment of child support.
Section 5 was amended, effective3/1/2012, to allow a presiding judge to authorize a judicial referee to preside in proceedings involving disorderly conduct restraining orders.
Section 5 was amended, effective3/1/2014, to allow a presiding judge to authorize a judicial referee to preside in small claims and traffic court proceedings.
Section 5 was amended, effective 3/1/2015, to allow a presiding judge to authorize a judicial referee to preside in emergency guardianship proceedings.
Section 5 was amended effective 8/1/2017, to allow a presiding judge to authorize a judicial referee to preside in sexual assault restraining order proceedings.
Section 5 was amended, effective 3/1/2018, to allow a presiding judge to authorize a judicial referee to preside in eviction and guardianship proceedings.
Section 5 was amended effective 1/1/2019, to allow a presiding judge to authorize a judicial referee to preside in eviction and conservatorship proceedings.
Section 7 was amended, effective3/1/2014, to clarify that small claims and traffic court matters decided by a judicial referee are not heard on the record.
Section 8 was amended, effective3/1/2011, to increase the time to request a district court judge from five to seven days after service of initiating documents.
Section 11(a) was amended, effective3/1/2011, to increase the time to request a review from a district court judge from five to seven days after service of the right to review. The time to respond to a request for review was increased from 10 to 14 days after service of notice of the request.
Section 11(a) was amended, effective3/1/2014, to clarify that small claims and traffic court matters decided by a judicial referee are not reviewable or appealable.