N.D. R. Crim. P. 17
Joint Procedure Committee Minutes of September 29-30, 2016, pages 27-28; January 26-27, 2012, pages 3-7; September 30, 2011, pages 12-15; April 28-29, 2011, page 25; April 26-27, 2007, pages 22-23; April 27-28, 2006, pages 2-5, 15-17; January 27-28, 2005, pages 13-14; April 20, 1989, page 4; December 3, 1987, page 15; November 18-19, 1982, pages 10-13; October 15-16, 1981, pages 6-10; October 12-13, 1978, page 8; June 26-27, 1972, pages 14-20; July 25-26, 1968, pages 6-10; Fed.R.Crim.P. 17.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Rule 17 was amended 9/1/1983; March 1, 1990; 3/1/2006; 6/1/2006; 3/1/2008; 3/1/2013; 3/1/2018.
Rule 17 follows Fed.R.Crim.P. 17 in substance and controls with respect to all subpoenas in criminal cases issued by the courts of this state.
Rule 17 is not limited to subpoena for the trial. A subpoena may be issued for a preliminary hearing, in aid of a grand jury investigation, for a deposition, or for a determination of an issue of fact raised by a pretrial motion. Rule 17 is also intended to obtain witnesses and documents for use as evidence, although it is not a discovery device.
Rule 17 was amended, effective 3/1/2006, in response to the12/1/2002, revision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules.
Paragraph (a)(1) follows Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(a) except that subpoenas may be issued by the magistrate as well as the clerk of court. The fact that some of the lesser state courts are without the benefit of a clerk necessitates this requirement.
Paragraph (a)(2) was amended, effective 9/1/1983, to provide that an attorney for a party may issue subpoenas with the same effect as the clerk or magistrate.
Subdivision (b), which provided assistance for indigent defendants seeking to subpoena persons, was deleted, effective 6/1/2006. As of1/1/2006, the North Dakota Commission on Legal Counsel for Indigents became responsible for providing defense services, including subpoenas, to indigent defendants.
Subdivision (c) follows Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c) and authorizes issuance of a subpoena duces tecum. Rule 17 generally is available to any "party" and this is no less true of subdivision (c). Thus the prosecution as well as the defendant may use subdivision (c), subject to the limitations imposed by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
Subdivision (d) was amended, effective 3/1/2006, to simplify service instructions for a subpoena and to eliminate outmoded methods of service. Subdivision (d) was amended, effective 3/1/2008, to eliminate an obsolete cross-reference.
A subpoena will ordinarily be served by a peace officer although subdivision (d) permits service by any person who is not a party and who is 18 or more years old. Service of a subpoena under Fed.R.Crim.P. 17 has been held effective only if the fee for one day's attendance and the mileage allowed by law are tendered to the witness when the subpoena is delivered. Fees and mileage need not be tendered if the subpoena is issued in behalf of the state or on behalf of a defendant unable to pay.
Subdivision (e) is an adaptation of the Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure. Under N.D.C.C. ch. 31-03 (Means of Compelling Attendance of Witnesses), North Dakota has adopted a Uniform Act to secure the attendance of witnesses from another state in criminal proceedings. Under paragraph (e)(2) service of subpoenas on witnesses out-of-state is governed by N.D.C.C. ch. 31-03.
Subdivision (e) was amended, effective 3/1/2013, to direct persons to N.D.R.Ct. 5.1 for information about how to proceed with discovery in this state in an action pending in an out-of-state court. N.D.R.Ct. 5.1 outlines procedure for interstate depositions and discovery. Subdivision (f) follows Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(f), with appropriate changes to satisfy the requirements of North Dakota. Paragraph (f)(1) provides that a court order for the taking of depositions gives authority to the clerk of court magistrate or an attorney for a party to the proceeding to issue subpoenas for the persons named or described therein.
Paragraph (f)(2) provides the court with discretion in determining where the deposition is to be taken.
Subdivision (g) follows N.D.R.Civ.P. 45(e). This provision merely restates existing law.
Subdivision (h) was adopted, effective 9/1/1983, to provide that statements made by witnesses or prospective witnesses are not subject to subpoena under Rule 17 but are subject to production in accordance with Rule 16. This correlates to Rule 16 's provisions relating to production of statements.
STATUTES AFFECTED:
SUPERSEDED: N.D.C.C. § § 31-03-04, 31-03-07, 31-03-08, 31-03-09, 31-03-13, 31-06-07, 40-18-09.
CONSIDERED: N.D.C.C. § § 29-10.1-19, 31-03-01, 31-03-15, 31-03-16, 31-03-17, 31-03-18, 31-03-25, 31-03-26, 31-03-27, 31-03-28, 31-03-29, 31-03-30, 31-03-31.
N.D.R.Civ.P. 45 (Subpoena).