An advisory letter is not a sanction and is not a disciplinary action. An advisory letter may not be introduced into evidence in any subsequent disciplinary proceeding.
Members of the inquiry committee, hearing panel, the board, or the supreme 46 court shall not communicate ex parte with disciplinary counsel regarding a pending 47 or impending investigation or disciplinary matter except as explicitly provided for by 48 law or for procedural, scheduling, or administrative purposes, or emergencies that do 49 not deal with substantive matters or issues on the matters provided that:
N.D. R. Law. Disc. 2.5
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Rule 2.5 adopted effective January 1, 1995; amended on an emergency basis effective July 16, 1998; adopted on a final basis effective September 8, 1998; amended effective July 1, 1999; amended effective March 1, 2017.
Section B was amended effective March 1, 2017, to establish new disciplinary counsel duties related to receiving and screening all complaints to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate, investigation of all information and complaints, summary dismissal of a complaint under Rule 3.1C, providing training and education, rather than advising, the disciplinary board, hearing panels, and inquiry committees, and maintaining permanent records of informal matters.
New Section C was created effective March 1, 2017, to provide for the issuance to a respondent lawyer of an advisory letter by disciplinary counsel if directed by the inquiry committee.
New Section D was created effective March 1, 2017, to prohibit, with certain exceptions, ex parte communications between disciplinary counsel and members of the inquiry committees, hearing panel, disciplinary board, or the supreme court.