N.M. R. Crim. P. Metro. Ct. 7-506.1
Committee commentary. - In 2004, Rule 7-506 NMRA was split into two rules. This rule is former Paragraphs A through D of Rule 7-506 NMRA.
The court's acceptance of a no contest or guilty plea does not raise a double jeopardy bar to subsequent prosecution if the charges to which the defendant has pled subsequently are dismissed prior to sentencing. See State v. Angel, 2002-NMSC-025, ¶ 16, 132 N.M. 501, 51 P.3d 1155 (holding that double jeopardy did not bar subsequent prosecution in district court where the magistrate court accepted the defendant's no contest plea to misdemeanor offenses but dismissed the charges prior to sentencing); see also State v. Lizzol, 2007-NMSC-024, ¶ 7, 141 N.M. 705, 160 P.3d 886 (explaining that whether a dismissal constitutes an acquittal, and therefore bars reprosecution on double jeopardy grounds, depends on "whether the trial court's ruling, however labeled, correctly or incorrectly resolved some or all of the factual elements of the crime").
Paragraph E was added in 2017 to address the inefficiency and confusion that may arise when the same charges are pending in both metropolitan court and district court, or when charges that were filed together as a single case in metropolitan court are split into two cases, one in metropolitan court and one in district court. For example, an indictment may be filed in district court that includes the felony charges pending in metropolitan court but not the associated misdemeanor charges. Upon notice from the prosecutor, the metropolitan court should dismiss its entire case without prejudice. The prosecutor retains discretion to refile charges in either district or metropolitan court.
[As amended by Supreme Court Order No. 17-8300-024, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2017.]
ANNOTATIONS The 2017 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 17-8300-024, effective December 31, 2017, revised the provisions for voluntary dismissals, provided for the dismissal of cases in metropolitan court when the same charges are pending in both metropolitan and district court, made technical revisions to the rule, and revised the committee commentary; in Paragraph A, Subparagraph A(1), after "trial", deleted "if the charges are within metropolitan court trial jurisdiction", in Subparagraph A(2), deleted "prior to the commencement of a preliminary examination in the metropolitan court, if the charges are not within metropolitan court trial jurisdiction" and added "after the acceptance of a plea of guilty or no contest, but prior to sentencing"; in Paragraph B, after "shall", deleted "not", and after "exonerate a bond", deleted "prior to the expiration of the time for automatic exoneration pursuant to Subparagraphs A(1) or A(2) of" and added "only as provided in", after "Rule 7-406 NMRA", deleted "of these rules"; in Paragraph C, in the paragraph heading, deleted "cases within metropolitan court trial jurisdiction"; in Paragraph D, in the paragraph heading, added "cases within metropolitan court trial jurisdiction", and added the last sentence; and added Paragraph E. The 2004 amendment. - Paragraphs A and B of this rule are the same as Paragraphs A through B of Rule 7-506 prior to the August 1, 2004 amendment of that rule. Paragraph C of this rule relating to refiled complaints replaces former Paragraph C of Rule 7-506 NMRA. Paragraph D of this rule replaced former Paragraph D of Rule 7-506 NMRA. Applicability of 2004 amendments. - The August 1, 2004 amendment of this rule applies to cases filed in the metropolitan court on and after August 1, 2004. See the prior rule for cases filed prior to that date. Recompilations. - Pursuant to Supreme Court Order No. 17-8300-024, former 7-506A NMRA was recompiled and amended as 7-506.1 NMRA, effective December 31, 2017.
For procedure to withdrawal of a plea by the defendant or rejection plea by the court, see Rule 7-502 NMRA . For form on notice of dismissal of criminal complaint, see Criminal Form 9-415 NMRA.