N.M. R. Civ. P. Magist. Ct. 2-806
Committee commentary. - This rule was adopted in 2014 to create a uniform, statewide procedure for managing mediation case files in the magistrate and metropolitan courts. This rule allows parties who have entered into a mediated settlement agreement to file a stipulation of dismissal of the pending case, while the court retains jurisdiction to later reopen the case and enter a judgment if a party fails to comply with the terms of the agreement. This rule does not preclude the parties to a mediated settlement agreement from asking the court to enter a stipulated judgment, rather than filing a stipulation of dismissal.
The court's authority under this rule to reopen a case that has been dismissed and to enter a judgment enforcing a mediated settlement agreement is limited to a five (5)-year period following the filing of the stipulation of dismissal. The time limitations in this rule do not limit the parties' right to file a breach of contract action or pursue other remedies in accordance with the law.
In addition to clarifying case management procedures, this rule is intended to promote mediation by providing incentives to both parties. For example, a debtor who pays under the terms of a mediated settlement agreement can obtain a dismissal of the lawsuit and avoid an adverse legal judgment. The creditor can secure payment of a debt under the terms of a mediated settlement agreement, while reserving the option to later seek a judgment-without having to file an additional lawsuit for breach of contract- if the debtor fails to pay.
Generally, the parties should file the mediated settlement agreement with the court, along with the stipulation of dismissal. But if the parties choose to keep the agreement confidential under Subparagraph (B)(3) of this rule, each party should retain a copy of the agreement.
[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 14-8300-012, effective for all cases filed or pending on or after December 31, 2014.]