N.M. R. Civ. P. Dist. Ct. 1-088
ANNOTATIONS The 2017 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 17-8300-026, effective December 31, 2017, removed the provision allowing the parties to stipulate to a replacement judge after a district judge has been excused or recused, and removed the provision allowing the parties to file a stipulation designating a judge of a judicial district to preside over a matter where a civil proceeding is filed by or against a judge or an employee of the same district, and provided that in such cases a judge from another district shall be designated; in Paragraph B, deleted "In the event" and added "Upon the filing of a notice that", after "has been excused or recused", deleted "counsel for all parties may agree to a district judge to hear all further proceedings and if that district judge so agrees, the clerk of the district court shall assign the case to such district judge. In the event counsel for all parties do not stipulate upon a district judge to try the case or the district judge upon whom they agree refuses to accept the case, within ten (10) days, or in the event that one party notifies the clerk of the district court in writing that they will be unable to agree on a replacement district judge", and after the second occurrence of "have been excused or recused", deleted "and the counsel for all parties have not agreed within ten (10) days on a judge to hear the case"; and in Paragraph C, after "employee of the district", deleted "no judge of the district may hear the matter without written agreement of the parties. If within ten (10) days after the proceeding is filed, the parties have not filed a stipulation designating a judge to preside over the matter, the clerk shall request the Supreme Court to designate a judge" and added "a judge from another district shall be designated in accordance with procedures ordered by the chief justice". The 2009 amendment, as approved by Supreme Court Order No. 09-8300-004, effective April 8, 2009, added Paragraph F. The 2000 amendment, effective for cases filed on or after March 1, 2000, redesignated former Paragraph C as Paragraph E and added Paragraphs C and D. Law reviews. - For article, "Separation of Powers and the Judicial Rule-Making Power in New Mexico: The Need for Prudential Restraints," see 15 N.M.L. Rev. 407 (1985). Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. - Construction and validity of state provisions governing designation of substitute, pro tempore, or special judge, 97 A.L.R.5th 537.