N.M. R. App. P. 12-309
ANNOTATIONS The 2016 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 16-8300-011, effective December 31, 2016, revised the procedure for filing a reply to an adverse party's response to a motion, and made stylistic and technical changes; in Paragraph (C), after "whether", deleted "upon" and added "on"; in Paragraph (D), in the heading, deleted "responses; replies"; after the third sentence of Paragraph (D), added a new paragraph designation and heading "E. Responses."; in new Paragraph (E), after the heading, deleted "Adverse parties" and added "An adverse party", and after the first sentence, added a new paragraph designation and heading "F. Replies"; and in new Paragraph (F), after "may be granted", deleted "upon" and added "on", and added the second sentence. The 2012 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-005, effective April 20, 2012, prohibited replies without leave of the court; in Paragraph D, in the title, deleted "Procedure motions" and added "Briefs; responses; replies"; combined former Paragraph E and Paragraph D by deleting the paragraph designation and title for former Paragraph E; and added the last sentence in Paragraph D. The 2010 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 10-8300-045, effective February 9, 2011, in Paragraph B, in the third sentence, added "If the case has not been previously docketed in the appellate court, subject to the provisions of Rule 12-304 NMRA and Rule 23-114 NMRA", after "docket fee" deleted "has not already been paid, it must" and added "shall", and after "accompany the motion" deleted "unless free process has been granted in which case the free process order shall accompany the motion"; and in Paragraph D, in the first sentence, after "Motions" deleted "seeking extensions of time, leave to exceed the length of brief permitted by these rules and similar motions", and after "procedural matters" added "such as motions seeking extensions of time and motions for leave to exceed length limitations". The 1999 amendment, effective for cases filed on and after January 1, 2000, substituted "fifteen (15)" for "ten (10)" in the last sentence of Paragraph E. The 1995 amendment, effective October 1, 1995, added Paragraph C and redesignated the remaining paragraphs accordingly.
For federal rule, see Fed. R. App. P. Rule 27. Requirements for motion to dismiss appeal, etc. - Motion to dismiss an appeal or writ of error, strike a bill of exceptions or otherwise dispose of any cause except upon its merits, based upon other than jurisdictional grounds, would not be granted except upon a showing of prejudice to the moving party, or that the ends of justice required the granting thereof, under former Supreme Court Rules. Barelas Cmty. Ditch Corp. v. City of Albuquerque, 1956-NMSC-057, 61 N.M. 222, 297 P.2d 1051. Party filing motion for rehearing without supporting brief was not entitled to reconsideration as of right under former Supreme Court Rules. Dunne v. Petterman, 1948-NMSC-035, 52 N.M. 284, 197 P.2d 618. Reviewable questions on rehearing were limited to those presented by the points originally relied upon for reversal, matters authorized by supreme court rules and errors asserted in the motion for rehearing under former Supreme Court Rules. Sanchez v. Dale Bellamah Homes of N.M., Inc., 1966-NMSC-040, 76 N.M. 526, 417 P.2d 25. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. - 5 C.J.S. Appeal and Error § 641 et seq.