Rule 56 - Summary Judgment(a)Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment. A party may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense-or the part of each claim or defense-on which summary judgment is sought. The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court should state on the record the reasons for granting or denying the motion.(b)Time to File a Motion. Unless a different time is set by local rule or the court orders otherwise, a party may file a motion for summary judgment at any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery.(c)Procedures.(1)Supporting Factual Positions. A party asserting that a fact cannot be or is genuinely disputed must support the assertion by:(A) citing to particular parts of materials in the record, including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations (including those made for purposes of the motion only), admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials; or(B) showing that the materials cited do not establish the absence or presence of a genuine dispute, or that an adverse party cannot produce admissible evidence to support the fact.(2)Objection That a Fact Is Not Supported by Admissible Evidence. A party may object that the material cited to support or dispute a fact cannot be presented in a form that would be admissible in evidence.(3)Materials Not Cited. The court need consider only the cited materials, but it may consider other materials in the record.(4)Affidavits or Declarations. An affidavit or declaration used to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant or declarant is competent to testify on the matters stated.(d)When Facts Are Unavailable to the Nonmovant.If a nonmovant shows by affidavit or declaration that, for specified reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition, the court may:(1) defer considering the motion or deny it;(2) allow time to obtain affidavits or declarations or to take discovery; or(3) issue any other appropriate order.(e) Failing to Properly Support or Address a Fact. If a party fails to properly support an assertion of fact or fails to properly address another party's assertion of fact as required by Rule 56(c), the court may: (1) give an opportunity to properly support or address the fact;(2) consider the fact undisputed for purposes of the motion;(3) grant summary judgment if the motion and supporting materials-including the facts considered undisputed-show that the movant is entitled to it; or(4) issue any other appropriate order.(f)Judgment Independent of the Motion. After giving notice and a reasonable time to respond, the court may: (1) grant summary judgment for a nonmovant;(2) grant the motion on grounds not raised by a party; or(3) consider summary judgment on its own after identifying for the parties material facts that may not be genuinely in dispute.(g)Failing to Grant All the Requested Relief. If the court does not grant all the relief requested by the motion, it may enter an order stating any material fact-including an item of damages or other relief-that is not genuinely in dispute and treating the fact as established in the case.(h)Affidavit or Declaration Submitted in Bad Faith. If satisfied that an affidavit or declaration under this rule is submitted in bad faith or solely for delay, the court-after notice and a reasonable time to respond- may order the submitting party to pay the other party the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, it incurred as a result. An offending party or attorney may also be held in contempt or subjected to other appropriate sanctions.Last amended effective 1/1/2005; amended effective 3/1/2019.Advisory Committee Note 2019 Amendment Subsection (a). Rule 56(a) retains the word "shall" consistent with the advisory committee notes to the 2010 amendments to FRCP 56 to preserve Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 121 P.3d 1026 (2005), and its progeny.
Subsection (d). Rule 56(d) modernizes the text of former NRCP 56(f) consistent with FRCP 56(d). The changes are stylistic and do not affect Choy v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 127 Nev. 870, 265 P.3d 698 (2011), which requires an affidavit to justify a request for a continuance of the summary judgment proceeding to conduct further discovery.
Subsection (e). The judicial discretion afforded under new Rule 56(e) ensures fairness in the individual case; it should not excuse inadequate motion practice.
Drafter's Note
2004 Amendment
Subdivision (c) is amended to make clear that motions for summary judgment and responses thereto must identify each material fact that the party claims is or is not genuinely in issue and must cite the relevant portions of any documents or evidence upon which the party relies. The new language is taken from Rule 56-1 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The provision is also amended to require that an order granting summary judgment set forth the undisputed material facts and legal determinations that support the decision to grant summary judgment.