Nev. R. Civ. P. 34
Advisory Committee Note 2019 Amendment
The amendments generally conform Rule 34 to FRCP 34. The new provisions in Rule 34(b)(2)(E)(i) address a production of documents in the form kept in the usual course of business, often electronically, that is wholly unrelated to the document requests. If it would be unreasonably burdensome for the requesting party to correlate the documents, the requesting party can request that the responding party specify the correlation. The identification of responsive documents may be assisted by the use of Bates numbering. Rule 34(d) retains the former Nevada rule with provisions added to address electronically stored information.
Drafter's Note
2004 Amendment
The rule, with the exception of subdivision (d), is amended to conform to the federal rule. The amendments to subdivision (a) are technical. Subdivision (b) is amended to reflect changes made to Rule 26(a) and (d), preventing a party from seeking formal discovery before complying with Rule 26(a). It is also amended to clarify that the response must first set forth each request for production, followed by the answer or objections to the request. Subdivision (c) is amended to reflect the changes made to Rule 45 to provide for subpoenas to compel nonparties to produce documents and things and to submit to inspections of premises. Subdivision (d) of the former rule, which requires payment of reasonable expenses for copying, is retained. A similar provision was considered but rejected in the 2000 amendments to the federal rules.