Nev. R. Civ. P. 5
Advisory Committee Note 2019 Amendment
Rule 5 generally conforms to FRCP 5. It retains former NRCP 5(a) 's reference to a "paper relating to discovery" to remind practitioners of the need to serve discovery documents on other parties, including deposition notices under Rule 30, requests for inspections under Rule 34, and subpoenas directed to a third party under Rule 45.
The amendments to Rule 5 relating to electronic filing and service reflect Nevada rules (such as the NEFCR) and practice. Rule 5(b)(4) retains the provisions requiring a proof of service to be attached to an electronic filing; the April 2018 amendments to the federal rule eliminating the proof of service for electronic filing are not adopted. NEFCR 9 bases the time to respond to a document served through an electronic filing system on the date stated in the proof of service.
Drafter's Note
2004 Amendment
Subdivision (b) is reorganized to make its provisions more accessible. Subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of Rule 5(b)(2) retain the method-of-service provisions of former Rule 5(b). Subparagraph (D) is new. It permits service by electronic means, including facsimile and electronic-mail, consistent with the 2001 amendments to the federal rule. Subdivision (b)(2)(D) provides that the served attorney or party must consent in writing to service by electronic means and includes specific provisions governing the form and content of the consent to service by electronic means. Subdivision (b)(3) is also new. It addresses the question of failed electronic service. Subdivision (b)(4) retains the proof-of-service provisions of former Rule 5(b).
Subdivision (e) is revised to conform to the 1991 and 1996 amendments to the federal rule. First, the amendment adds language that prohibits the clerk from refusing to ''accept for filing any paper presented for that purpose solely because it is not presented in proper form as required by these rules or any local rules or practices.'' Second, the amendment adds language to accommodate local rules that authorize filing by facsimile or other electronic means and thereby empowers the district courts to address the adoption of electronic filing based on the capabilities of both the district court clerk's office and the desires of the bench and bar.