Neb. Sup. Ct. R. 6-327
COMMENTS TO § 6-327
[1] The primary purpose of the rule is to perpetuate evidence - in other words, to preserve evidence (usually, witness testimony) - that might otherwise be lost before the action is filed. The original version of the rule required the person seeking to perpetuate evidence to file a petition in the district court for the district in which any expected adverse party resides. The 2024 Amendments changed that to the district court for the county where any expected adverse party resides. As a result of the change, the venue provisions of the rule are now consistent with the residency provisions of the general venue statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-401.01(1).
[2] Subpart (a)(2) authorizes substitute service on an expected adverse party who cannot be served by the normal methods of service. Subpart (a)(3) requires the court to appoint an attorney to represent an expected adverse party who is served by substitute service. Subpart (a)(3) also requires the court to appoint a guardian ad litem for any expected adverse party who is a minor or an incompetent person. If a minor or an incompetent person is served by substitute service, then the court must appoint both an attorney and a guardian ad litem. The reason is that roles of the attorney and guardian are different. The role of an attorney is to represent the party's legal interests. The role of a guardian ad litem is to act in the best interests of the party and to make decisions for the party, including the decisions that a client normally makes.
[3] The rule does not discuss who pays the attorney or the guardian. That is a matter left to the district court's discretion.
[4] Subpart (a)(5) discusses when a deposition that was taken to perpetuate evidence may be used in the action once it is filed. If the deposition was taken pursuant to Federal Rule 27 or the law of another state, then the deposition may be used if it would be admissible in the federal or state court that authorized it to be taken. The reason for including federal courts is that a petition to perpetuate could be filed in federal court and the action filed in state court.
[5] Subpart (b) governs motions to perpetuate testimony that are filed while an appeal is pending. The motion must be filed in the appellate court because the trial court loses jurisdiction once the appeal is filed. See Billups v. Scott, 253 Neb. 293, 294 (1997). Because the trial court may be more familiar with the case than the appellate court is, the rule gives the appellate court the discretion to remand the motion to the trial court. The appellate court, however, retains jurisdiction of the appeal.
[6] Subpart (b) only applies if an appeal has been taken. It does not authorize a party to file a motion to perpetuate after judgment is entered but before the time for appeal expires. The party's only option in that situation is to file an independent action to perpetuate testimony. Subpart (c) specifically provides that therule does not limit a court's power to entertain an action to perpetuate testimony.