Miss. R. Crim. P. 3.2
Comment
Where circumstances dictate issuance of an arrest warrant rather than a summons, yet there is reason for use of recognizance release, Rule 3.2(a) gives the issuing judge the flexibility of allowing a personal recognizance release, subject to the mandatory conditions of release in Rule 8.4(a). The release of an arrested defendant on recognizance would not preclude the defendant's having to appear at the initial hearing, but might preclude the defendant's spending the night in jail unnecessarily. Alternatively, the issuing judge has discretion to set an appearance bond or secured appearance bond in the warrant, if the defendant is bailable as a matter of right.
Rule 3.2(c)(1) states that an arrest warrant be directed to and executed by "any officer authorized by law within the State of Mississippi." Mississippi law authorizes a broad range of officers to make arrests. See Miss. Code Ann. §§ 99-3-1(1), 99-3-2.
Rule 3.2(d) is designed to make service of the summons as easy and expeditious as possible. The function of the summons is solely to apprise the defendant of the charges and to notify the defendant to appear. Delivery of a copy of the summons by U.S. mail is similar to the procedure utilized for summoning persons whose names are drawn for jury duty. See Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-28. A defendant's failure to respond to a mailed summons does not provide valid grounds for the issuance of a contempt-based arrest warrant.
Under Rule 3.2(e), a mere defect in form will not invalidate an arrest warrant. Normally, aliases, fictitious names, and descriptions are matters of form and may be amended if judicially determined to be incorrect.