If a large group of persons or firms can be specified by a generic description, individual listing is not necessary.
The certificate shall be in the following form:
Number and Style of Case.
The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the justices of the Supreme Court and/or the judges of the Court of Appeals may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal.
(Here list names of all such persons and identify their connection and interest.)
_____________________________________________________
Attorney of record for ______________________________________
Governmental parties need not supply this certificate.
(1) the style of the case, and, |
(2) the number of CD-ROMs, i.e., "1 of 2, 2 of 2, etc.," |
Miss. R. App. P. 28
ADVISORY COMMITTEE HISTORICAL NOTE
Effective December 11, 1997, Rule 28(e) and the Comment were amended to provide a vendor and media neutral citation standard in the public domain. 702-705 So.2d XLI (West Miss.Cases 1997).
Effective December 28, 1995, Rule 28(m) and a new final paragraph to the Comment were added to encourage the filing of disk copies of briefs. 663-667 So.2d XXVII (West Miss.Cases 1995).
Effective January 1, 1995, M.R.A.P. 28 replaced Miss.Sup.Ct.R. 28, embracing proceedings in the Court of Appeals. 644-647 So.2d LXIV-LXVII (West Miss.Cases 1994).
Effective July 1, 1994, the Comment to Miss.Sup.Ct.R. 28 was amended to delete material concerning the transition from statutory procedures to Rule practice. 632-635 So.2d LII (West Miss.Cases 1994).
Comment
Rule 28 is based upon Fed. R. App. P. 28 and 5 th Cir. R. 28.2.1, 28.2.2. If a party states issues under Rule 28(a)(3) not included in a statement required by Rule 10(b)(4), that party will bear responsibility for the cost of preparing any additional portions of the record subsequently designated by any other party in response to the statement of additional issues.
Article 3, section 26 of the Mississippi Constitution states that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions the accused shall have a right to be heard by himself or counsel, or both. . . ." Accordingly, pro se supplemental briefs are permitted under Rule 28(b). See also Lindsey v. State, 939 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 2005).
In cross-appeals, the response of the appellant to the cross-appeal is to be combined with the appellant's reply. The combined brief is treated as a principal brief under Rule 28(h) which governs page lengths.
Rule 28(f) requires parallel citations prior to 1967 because the Southern Reporter is the official reporter only for decisions published since 1966. Any party filing a brief citing an unreported decision from another court should also file a copy of the decision with the clerk of the Supreme Court.
Rule 28(f) adopts a citation standard which is in the public domain. The new citation standard is both vendor neutral and media neutral. A vendor neutral citation is one which does not contain vendor-specific information, and a media neutral citation is one which is not tied to a particular format. The citation Smith v. Jones, 699 So. 2d 100 (Miss. 1997), for example, is neither vendor neutral nor media neutral. However, the citation Smith v. Jones, 95-KA-01234-SCT (Miss. 1997) is both vendor neutral and media neutral. The basis for the adoption of a new citation standard is to allow citation of cases which appear in electronic format in addition to citation of cases which appear in print.
An original Rule 28(k) letter should be submitted with three copies. Rule 28(m) governs briefs other than briefs on the merits controlled by Rules 28(a), (b), (c), and (d).
The provisions of Rule 28(n) apply only to briefs on the merits of an appeal and not to memoranda and briefs filed in support of or in opposition to motions and petitions seeking less than relief on the merits of appeals.
[Amended December 28, 1995; December 22, 1997; amended effective May 27,2004; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective August 2, 2012.]