Mich. Ct. R. 6.104

As amended through September 25, 2024
Rule 6.104 - Arraignment on the Warrant or Complaint
(A) Arraignment Without Unnecessary Delay. Unless released beforehand, an arrested person must be taken without unnecessary delay before a court for arraignment in accordance with the provisions of this rule, or must be arraigned without unnecessary delay by use of two-way interactive video technology in accordance with MCR 6.006(A). The arrested person is entitled to the assistance of an attorney at arraignment unless
(1) the arrested person makes an informed waiver of counsel or
(2) the court issues a personal bond and will not accept a plea of guilty or no contest at arraignment.
(B) Place of Arraignment. An accused arrested pursuant to a warrant must be taken to a court specified in the warrant. An accused arrested without a warrant must be taken to a court in the judicial district in which the offense allegedly occurred. If the arrest occurs outside the county in which these courts are located, the arresting agency must make arrangements with the authorities in the demanding county to have the accused promptly transported to the latter county for arraignment in accordance with the provisions of this rule. If prompt transportation cannot be arranged, the accused must be taken without unnecessary delay before the nearest available court for preliminary appearance in accordance with subrule (C). In the alternative, the provisions of this subrule may be satisfied by use of two-way interactive video technology in accordance with MCR 6.006(A).
(C) Preliminary Appearance Outside County of Offense. When, under subrule (B), an accused is taken before a court outside the county of the alleged offense either in person or by way of two-way interactive video technology, the court must advise the accused of the rights specified in subrule (E)(2) and determine what form of pretrial release, if any, is appropriate. To be released, the accused must submit a recognizance for appearance within the next 14 days before a court specified in the arrest warrant or, in a case involving an arrest without a warrant, before either a court in the judicial district in which the offense allegedly occurred or some other court designated by that court. The court must certify the recognizance and have it delivered or sent without delay to the appropriate court. If the accused is not released, the arresting agency must arrange prompt transportation to the judicial district of the offense. In all cases, the arraignment is then to continue under subrule (D), if applicable, and subrule (E) either in the judicial district of the alleged offense or in such court as otherwise is designated.
(D) Arrest Without Warrant. If an accused is arrested without a warrant, a complaint complying with MCR 6.101 must be filed at or before the time of arraignment. On receiving the complaint and on finding probable cause, the court must either issue a warrant or endorse the complaint as provided in MCL 764.1c. Arraignment of the accused may then proceed in accordance with subrule (E).
(E) Arraignment Procedure; Judicial Responsibilities. The court at the arraignment must
(1) inform the accused of the nature of the offense charged, and its maximum possible prison sentence and any mandatory minimum sentence required by law;
(2) if the accused is not represented by a lawyer at the arraignment, advise the accused that
(a) the accused has a right to remain silent,
(b) anything the accused says orally or in writing can be used against the accused in court,
(c) the accused has a right to have a lawyer present during any questioning consented to, and
(d) if the accused does not have the money to hire a lawyer, the local indigent criminal defense system will appoint a lawyer for the accused;
(3) advise the accused of the right to a lawyer at all court proceedings;
(4) set a date for a probable cause conference not less than 7 days or more than 14 days after the date of the arraignment and set a date for preliminary examination not less than 5 days or more than 7 days after the date of the probable cause conference;
(5) determine what form of pretrial release, if any, is appropriate; and
(6) ensure that the accused has had biometric data collected as required by law.

The court may not question the accused about the alleged offense or request that the accused enter a plea.

(F) Arraignment Procedure; Recording. A verbatim record must be made of the arraignment.
(G) Plan for Judicial Availability. In each county, the court with trial jurisdiction over felony cases must adopt and file with the state court administrator a plan for judicial availability. The plan shall
(1) make a judicial officer available for arraignments each day of the year, or
(2) make a judicial officer available for setting bail for every person arrested for commission of a felony each day of the year conditioned upon
(a) the judicial officer being presented a proper complaint and finding probable cause pursuant to MCR 6.102(A), and
(b) the judicial officer having available information to set bail.

This portion of the plan must provide that the judicial officer shall order the arresting officials to arrange prompt transportation of any accused unable to post bond to the judicial district of the offense for arraignment not later than the next regular business day.

Mich. Ct. R. 6.104

Amended December 22, 2014, effective 1/1/2015; amended August 14, 2019, effective 8/14/2019; amended September 22, 2021, effective 1/1/2022.