Mass. Trial. Ct. R. 4
Committee notes
URIP Rule 4 provides the notice procedure for service of motions filed under the URIP in both civil and criminal cases. The procedure is based primarily on the requirements of Rules 4 and 5 of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 32 of the Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure, which incorporates Rule 5 of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure.
In limited circumstances, the movant can request the court to provide service on a person whose address is impounded. In such instances, the clerk shall make a separate entry on the docket that service was made in such manner.
Impoundment in Criminal Cases or After Service of Complaint in Civil Cases
Under URIP Rule 4(a), motions for impoundment and supporting affidavits served in criminal cases or after service of the complaint in civil cases are served in the same manner as written motions generally. A copy of the motion and supporting affidavit must either be mailed or delivered to each party, interested nonparty, and any other person named by the court. Service must be on the attorney for any represented person unless otherwise ordered by the court. In Superior Court civil cases, service shall be made in accordance with Superior Court Rule 9A.
Impoundment Prior to Filing of Civil Complaint
Under URIP Rule 4(b), if impoundment is sought prior to service of the complaint, service shall be made by an officer or specifically appointed person. See Mass. R. Civ. P. 4(c). Service on an individual within Massachusetts may be made by hand or at the party's "last and usual place of abode." See Mass. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1) . Service on a domestic corporation should be made by delivery to an officer or to a person in charge at its principal place of business within Massachusetts. See Mass. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2).
Service on Interested Nonparties
The movant shall serve notice upon interested nonparties at the same time the motion is sent or delivered to the court. The court may, upon motion or sua sponte, order notice of the motion for impoundment to be served on interested nonparties. This will allow interested nonparties the opportunity to be heard when the motion is first considered, and limit any situations where a "party gets the order on Monday and is back in court on Tuesday." Republican Co. v. Appeals Court, 442 Mass. 218, 225 (2004).