As soon as practicable, the clerk shall review a submission for compliance with Rule 20-201(g) and the published policies and procedures for acceptance established by the State Court Administrator. If the clerk determines that the filer has used an incorrect case number for the submission, and the error is not readily susceptible to correction pursuant to subsection (b)(1) of this Rule, the clerk shall reject the submission and promptly notify the filer. Unless otherwise ordered by the court for good cause shown, a refiled submission shall relate back to the filing of the rejected submission.
If the clerk determines that the filer failed to file both an unredacted and a redacted version of a submission when required under Rule 20-201.1, the clerk shall reject the submission and promptly notify the filer. The clerk shall enter on the docket that a submission was received but was rejected for non-compliance with Rule 20-201.1. A refiled submission shall not relate back to the filing of the rejected submission.
If the clerk determines that the filer has used an incorrect case number for the submission, and the error is not readily susceptible to correction pursuant to subsection (b)(1) of this Rule, the clerk shall reject the submission and promptly notify the filer. Unless otherwise ordered by the court for good cause shown, a submission refiled within 14 days after the notice was sent shall relate back to the filing of the rejected submission.
A submission filed in response to a deficiency notice shall make no other amendments, modifications, or changes to the submission except to correct the deficiency. If the filer timely corrects a deficiency, the clerk shall relate the new submission to the filing of the deficient submission. The record shall always reflect the date that each filing is submitted to the court.
If, pursuant to Rule 20-201.1(c), a filer has filed electronically a redacted and an unredacted submission, the clerk shall docket both submissions and shield the unredacted submission from public access. Any party and any person who is the subject of the restricted information contained in the unredacted submission may file a motion to strike the unredacted submission. Upon the filing of a motion and any timely answer, the court shall enter an appropriate order.
If a filer requests that a document included in a submission be placed under court seal pursuant to Rule 20-201.1 and identifies an existing order permitting the document to be sealed, the court shall seal the document.
If there is no existing order, but there is an attached motion and proposed order, the clerk shall docket the motion and proposed order, which shall be open to public inspection, but shield the document that is the subject of the motion and proposed order pending a ruling on the motion.
If there is no existing order and no attached motion and proposed order, the clerk shall reject the submission without prejudice to refile it with an attached motion and proposed order and promptly notify the filer. The clerk shall enter on the docket that a submission was received with a request that it be sealed and was rejected for non-compliance with Rule 20-201.1(d). Unless otherwise ordered by the court for good cause shown, a submission refiled within 14 days after the notice was sent shall relate back to the filing of the rejected submission.
Md. R. Elec. Fil'g & Case Mgmt. 20-203
This Rule is new.
HISTORICAL NOTES
2015 Orders
The March 2, 2015, order amended (d) to change the enforcement mechanism pertaining to correction of certain deficiencies and to provide for judicial review of a deficiency determination.
The December 7, 2015, order, in (c) deleted references to Rule 20-201(d) and added two references to Rule 20-107(a)(1).
2016 Orders
The June 6, 2016, order revised internal references in the Rule.
2017 Orders
The June 20, 2017 order, added a new subsection (a)(1) pertaining to the applicability of section (a); revised references pertaining to the clerk's review of a submission; added language to subsection (b)(1) that refers to a procedure for the clerk to notify a filer when a corrected docket entry requires a different fee than the fee required for the original docket entry, and permitted the filer to file a motion seeking review of the clerk's fee determination; in subsection (b)(3), added the language "on the docket and deleted language that refers to "docketing in the manner required by Rule 16-404; in section (c), added the language "subject to Rule 20-201(m), updated a certain internal reference, and deleted a reference to "Rule 20-201(f)(1)(B); in section (d), deleted current subsection (d)(2) and added language to provide that unless (1) an order is entered directing the clerk to withdraw the deficiency notice, or (2) the deficiency is otherwise resolved within 10 days after the notice was sent, the court shall strike the submission; added a new subsection (e)(3), pertaining to shielding on motion of a party; and made stylistic changes.
2018 Orders
The October 10, 2018 order deleted reference to all Rules in subsection (a)(2) except Rule 20-201(g) and deleted the second sentence of that subsection, deleted references to Rule 20-107(a)(1) from section (c), clarified procedures pertaining to certain non-compliant submissions, extended the time to resolve a deficiency in a filing to 14 days, and provided for the refund of certain fees only upon motion and order of the court.
2019 Orders
The May 15, 2019 order amended the rule to provide that the clerk is not required to send certain notifications to parties that have not been served and clarified that a deficiency notice is not sent if the deficiency is cured prior to the notice being sent.
Committee note: The clerk will reject the submission under subsection (f)(3) of this Rule because (1) the filer does not want the document to be accessible to the public and (2) there is nothing to present to a judge and no basis for placing the document under seal. The docket entry showing that a document was received and rejected is for transparency purposes.