Committee note: The issue of the plaintiff's right to condemn is a question of law for the court. Bouton v. Potomac Edison Co., 288 Md. 305 (1980).
Cross reference: See Bern-Shaw Limited Partnership v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 377 Md. 277 (2003), which held that section (c) of this Rule does not apply to aquick-take condemnation proceeding.
The parties, their attorneys, and other representatives may be present during a view. A jury shall be transported to and attend a view as a body under the charge of an officer of the court, and the expense of transporting the jury shall be assessed as costs.
Md. R. Prop. Act'n 12-207
This Rule is derived from former Rules U15, U17, and U18.
HISTORICAL NOTES
2005 Orders
The April 5, 2005, order rewrote section (b), which previously read:
"(b) Opening Statement. Each party to the action may make an opening statement to the trier of fact before the trier of fact views the property sought to be condemned. A plaintiff may reserve the opening statement until after the view. A defendant may reserve the opening statement until after the view or until the conclusion of the evidence offered by the plaintiff
The April 5, 2005, order also inserted the cross reference following section (b); and, in section (c), in the first sentence, inserted "or the condemnation is a "quick-take proceeding.
Derivation:
Maryland Rule of Procedure U15, revised May 22, 1963, eff. June 1, 1963, related to the right to trial by jury, rescinded June 5, 1996, eff. Jan. 1, 1997.
Maryland Rule of Procedure U17, revised May 22, 1963, eff. June 1, 1963, related to opening statements, rescinded June 5, 1996, eff. Jan. 1, 1997.
Maryland Rule of Procedure U18, related to viewing property, rescinded April 6, 1984, eff. July 1, 1984.