Me. Code. Jud. Cond. 3.6
Advisory Notes - 2015
Rule 3.6 is based on the 2011 ABA Model Code and is similar to 1993 Canon 2(C) which is supported by an extensive 1993 Advisory Committee's Note. Rule 3.6 differs in three ways from the 2011 Model Code.
First, it substitutes the term "unlawful discrimination" for the term "invidious discrimination" that appears in the Model Code. The change is made because the term "unlawful discrimination" is specific and definable by reference to anti-discrimination laws and judicial interpretations of those laws, while the term "invidious discrimination" is subjective and ambiguous and could invite many disputes about what acts are discriminatory based on an individual's perspective. See Advisory Notes to Rule 3.1.
Second, the redraft retains the current one-year window in 1993 Canon 2(C) for a judge, once he or she discovers that an organization is engaging in discriminatory practices, to withdraw from the organization if the discriminatory practices do not end. There is no similar window in the ABA Model Code.
Third, the redraft adds, as paragraph (C), a protection from complaint for a judge's membership in a religious organization. This addition is consistent with the purpose of Rule 3.6, as noted in Comment [4] to the 2011 Model Code.