Me. Code. Jud. Cond. 2.6
Advisory Notes - 2015
Rule 2.6(A) is identical to the first sentence of 1993 Canon 3(B)(7). Most of the remainder of 1993 Canon 3(B)(7), however, discusses ex parte communications. Section B(7)(d) of 1993 Canon 3 discusses approved judicial settlement promotion practices, but in terms different from new Rule 2.6(B). Thus, 1993 Canon 3(B)(7)(d) states: "A judge may, with the consent of the parties, confer separately with the parties with or without their lawyers present, or separately with their lawyers alone, in an effort to mediate or settle matters pending before the judge." Rule 2.6(B) indicates that judges who participate in trial management or settlement discussions or dispositional conferences may also preside at adjudicatory proceedings in the same case. However, a judge who participates in a formal settlement conference when there is an explicit understanding that another judge will conduct any trial or contested hearing, is disqualified from further participation in that case, other than placing any settlement reached on the record and, when necessary, enforcing a settlement that has been reached, unless the parties explicitly agree otherwise.
There is no Rule 2.6(C) in the ABA Model Code. Rule 2.6(C) is similar to 1993 Canon 3(B)(12) which states: "A Judge may explain the requirements of applicable rules and statutes so that a person appearing before the judge understands the process to be employed. A judge may also inform unrepresented persons of free legal aid and similar assistance that is available in the courthouse or otherwise." A change in the Rule adds the capacity to provide information about reduced cost assistance that may be available.
Rule 2.6 should be regarded as providing continuing ethical guidance for judges participating in case management and settlement discussions, and for judges providing appropriate support for unrepresented litigants to assure that the goals of fairness and equal access to the judicial process are supported.
.