Me. Bar. Admiss. R. 10
Advisory Note - December 2021
Subdivision (d) is amended to replace "handicap" with "disability" to comply with P.L. 2021, ch. 348, § 58, which requires the Judicial Branch to "discontinue the use of the terms 'handicap,' 'handicapped' and 'hearing impaired' to describe a person or set of persons in all laws, rules and official documents."
Advisory Notes - May 2017
In June 2016, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court created an Advisory Commission to study the merits of adopting the Uniform Bar Exam (UBE). After six months of study, on November 18, 2016, the Commission issued the Report and Recommendations of the Advisory Commission on the Uniform Bar Examination. Among other things, that Report recommended adoption of the UBE, acceptance of transferred UBE scores for a three-year period, and amendment of the admission by motion rule to make it more consistent with the ABA Model Rule for Admission by Motion.
On January 25, 2017, the Supreme Judicial Court indicated its acceptance of the Commission's recommendations and its intent to adopt the UBE, effective with the July 2017 administration of the bar examination. The amendments to Rule 10 reflect implementation of the Court's adoption of the UBE, which examination supplants both the full and modified Maine bar examination formats.
Advisory Notes - February 2016
Subdivisions (d)(1) and (e)(2) are amended to replace references to the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure with references to the Maine Rules of Unified Criminal Procedure, which became effective statewide on July 1, 2015.
Subdivision (k) clarifies the process for applicants to seek an extension of time for admission to the bar and ensures that notice is provided to the Board, which has an interest in the issue.
Advisory Note - June 2014
Subdivision (e)(2) is amended to replace the reference to the Maine Code of Professional Responsibility with a reference to the Maine Rules of Professional Conduct, which are now applicable.
Advisory Committee Note
The origins of the amended rule date back to 1938, see P.L. 1937, c. 25. At that time, law schools were accepting some applicants who had graduated from unaccredited institutions or who had not completed an undergraduate education. In fact, until 1963, see P.L. 1963, c. 369, it was possible to be admitted to the bar by "reading law" without ever having attended law school. In such circumstances, scrutiny of one's undergraduate education was much more relevant to the screening process.
The prerequisite of graduation from an accredited law school was not adopted until 1985, P.L. 1985, c. 124, §§ 3, 4. The Bar Admission Rules were amended shortly after the 1985 amendment to 4 M.R.S. §803 to reflect this change in the law.
With adoption of the requirement that applicants have graduated from either an ABA-accredited law school or one accredited by a U.S. jurisdiction in which the law school is located, it is no longer necessary to afford independent scrutiny to undergraduate education accreditation. The standards for quality of education leading to a law degree are established by the ABA itself or, in the instance of applicants admitted to practice for three years in another jurisdiction, by the state in which the law school is located. Thus, while the prerequisite of graduation from a college or university is maintained, the prerequisite of accreditation of the undergraduate institution by some official body is eliminated as unnecessary to the goals sought to be achieved by this rule.
.